More proof that global warming is a farce...

[stsinner]

Arizona is having its longest stretch of days below 100 degrees since 1913!!!! The global warming and climate change camp is just using this ruse as a money maker and a way to exert power over the people... Don't fall for it.

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articl...ovely0619.html

[PoliCon]

Wilbur will be here any second to give us the dogmatic explanation for how it's has nothing to do with any natural phenomenon and it 10,000% mans fault. SO SAYTH AL GORE!

[wilbur]

So you accept the voracity of temperature records of a small specific locale as an indicator for the soundness (or unsoundness) of the theory of man-made global climate change? Yes or no.

[PoliCon]

Less than 10 minutes . . . lol

[patriot45]

So you accept the voracity of temperature records of a small specific locale as an indicator for the soundness (or unsoundness) of the theory of man-made global climate change? Yes or no.

No! We outright object to the so called glowball warming, manmade or not! Oh yeah the PC term is climate change! :D
Winter
Spring
Summer and
Fall!

[wilbur]

Less than 10 minutes . . . lol

I didnt give any dogmatic explanation, did I? I asked a question. Feel free to answer it as well.

[PoliCon]

Your dogmatic explination is clear in your question. :) Doesn't take a genius to spot a loaded question.

[wilbur]

Your dogmatic explination is clear in your question. :) Doesn't take a genius to spot a loaded question.

There shouldn't be any 'dogmatic explanation' apparent in the question, because I don't plan to use the question, nor the answers, to argue for or against global warming, nor any other "dogma". Quit being scared.

[PoliCon]

There shouldn't be any 'dogmatic explanation' apparent in the question, because I don't plan to use the question, nor the answers, to argue for or against global warming, nor any other "dogma". Quit being scared.

[Molon Labe]

So you accept the voracity of temperature records of a small specific locale as an indicator for the soundness (or unsoundness) of the theory of man-made global climate change? Yes or no.

I agree with this, however...it's troublesome that many discount the 71% of the earths surface covered by water in the very studies that try to prove man made GCC. Which has routinely been much of the global warming establishment.