McCain looks to cut funding for more F-22 jets

[PoliCon]

Some things are mandatory, others are simply political payoffs.

Defense is one of the few things the Federal government is supposed to do.

DON'T CONFUSE HIM WITH FACTS FROM THE CONSTITUTION!!!

[Japandroid]

This isn't spending for America's defense budget, this is a blank check written to Lockheed Martin every year for more of these ridiculously overpriced jets. We have 141 of them already, I mean seriously -- dont you think that's enough?

[BadCat]

This isn't spending for America's defense budget, this is a blank check written to Lockheed Martin every year for more of these ridiculously overpriced jets. We have 141 of them already, I mean seriously -- dont you think that's enough?

Lockheed Martin is only a small part of the jobs that cutting this program will eliminate. Tens of thousands of other jobs at many other companies will disappear.

That'll look good on Obumbles record.

[Japandroid]

Lockheed Martin is only a small part of the jobs that cutting this program will eliminate. Tens of thousands of other jobs at many other companies will disappear.

That'll look good on Obumbles record.

Because they lost thier free check from the government every year because the Bush Admin is gone? And isn't the ENTIRE CONSERVATIVE PHILOSOPHY based around the government not being able to create jobs?

I'm stunned. Really, you dont even know what you believe in.

[BadCat]

Because they lost thier free check from the government every year because the Bush Admin is gone? And isn't the ENTIRE CONSERVATIVE PHILOSOPHY based around the government not being able to create jobs?

I'm stunned. Really, you dont even know what you believe in.

Slam you dick in the door again?

I believe that around 100000 jobs will be lost when they cut the contract. That's all.

I believe YOUR BOY will get blamed for it.

[Japandroid]

Slam you dick in the door again?

I believe that around 100000 jobs will be lost when they cut the contract. That's all.

I believe YOUR BOY will get blamed for it.

The point is you should not care. By that rationale all these spending increases by Obama are going to create more jobs.

[BadCat]

The point is you should not care. By that rationale all these spending increases by Obama are going to create more jobs.

Did I say I cared?

I just said that many jobs will be lost, your boy and his party will be blamed. How many more votes can you all afford to lose?

[Japandroid]

Did I say I cared?

I just said that many jobs will be lost, your boy and his party will be blamed. How many more votes can you all afford to lose?

What? You dont care? Why are you even talking about this?

You say when the government cuts spending jobs are lost. But Obama is most definitely increasing spending, so more jobs should be created. Obama and his majority in Congress will be not blamed, but credited with one of the most massive economic turnarounds in history!

This is not necessarily my logic, but it is yours.

[BadCat]

What? You dont care? Why are you even talking about this?

You say when the government cuts spending jobs are lost. But Obama is most definitely increasing spending, so more jobs should be created. Obama and his majority in Congress will be not blamed, but credited with one of the most massive economic turnarounds in history!

This is not necessarily my logic, but it is yours.

You are really deluded.

[Japandroid]

BadCat, you're a lot of fun. I should let you know that.