Isn't a reduction in troops a sign of progress for Iraq?
This is great news!
Thank you Australia for all your help!
I thought the Ron Paul supporters wanted everyone to pull out of Iraq....now you don't????
Hon, I love 'ya but it's time to stop stirring s**t.Originally Posted by gator
The Australian people (the same ones that gave up their right to keep and bear arms) voted in a Left Wing cut and run government. The government did exactly what the people wanted.
There are still Coalition troops dying in Iraq and the Australians were too chickenshit to stick it out.
Not very reliable allies if you ask me.
The Australian troops will do as good a job as any Coalition member but the government decided to cut and run. They left a few support troops behind but they won't be in harm's way.
If you remember what I said when I endorsed Ron Paul was that I differed from him in thinking we needed to complete the mission in Iraq before extracting ourselves from Middle East interventionism. If we don’t complete the mission we will be withdrawing from a position of weakness instead of strength.
Last edited by gator; 06-01-2008 at 01:50 PM.
You are going to end up alone on this board "posting truths".
What part of that is untrue?
My characterization of them being chickenshits would apply to America or anybody else if we did the same thing.
I will be saying the same thing about my government if Obamaclinton is elected and we do the cut and run two step.
Would you rather not discuss such delicate matters or would you rather I not make value judgments?
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|