Ahh yes! It is good to be one of the elite high quality conservatives. We make them look stupid. They can't have that!
|
|
07-18-2009, 02:26 PM
Ahh yes! It is good to be one of the elite high quality conservatives. We make them look stupid. They can't have that!
07-18-2009, 04:04 PM
They do sneak in thier mentions of us! Even I got a mention a few years ago for all things a joke I had in the humor forum, it upset one of the moonbats enuf that it just had to complain to the hive! We have alot of members on thier hate list too! Wish I was on that! :D
07-18-2009, 04:04 PM
That coupled with your avatar made that one hell of a funny post!! Thanks for the laugh...Originally Posted by Rockntractor
I get all the DU I need from you guys who bring all the whackjobbery over here for us to see...
07-18-2009, 06:32 PM
they have a hate list? :) do you have a link? I'd love to make that list!
07-18-2009, 06:37 PM
Your not evil enough. Yet!they have a hate list? :) do you have a link? I'd love to make that list!
07-18-2009, 07:10 PM
give me a goal and watch me reach it :)
07-19-2009, 02:45 AM
No, CU is not important enough to hit their radar. [/shitstir]
07-19-2009, 02:47 AM
To be fair to DU, they're mostly borrowing from a few select forums of the website. The rest of it is hardly mentioned. Truth be told, the rest of it isn't that bad. I know this personally.
07-19-2009, 03:21 PM
$kinner and the Inner Circule are frightened that the Denizens might read something over here and question the limited wisdom found on DU.
Its like in Nazi Germany that it was a crime to listen to the BBC, or how the Soviets tried to block Radio Free Europe. They're just another little cyber fascist state that fears free minds more then anything else.
You listening $kinner? One day, liberty will not be denied!
UP THE REBELS!!!
07-19-2009, 08:31 PM
http://www.democraticunderground.com...ss=389x6104139Rwalsh (81 posts) Sun Jul-19-09 06:56 PM
Original message
Banned Websites
I think it's time to add Free Republic to the list of banned websites.
IMO, anything posted from there is by definition is a violation of DU rules. And, rules aside, it's just plain wrong and totally against everything DU stands for.
Thoughts?
inna (940 posts) Sun Jul-19-09 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. i completely disagree that certain sites should be banned...
...from being referenced on DU.
it's deeply and obviously wrong, imo.dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Sun Jul-19-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. nope.
but people with less than 100 posts shouldn't get to propose rule changes. how about that?Rwalsh (81 posts) Sun Jul-19-09 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
17. From the DU rules
Do not post messages that give publicity to websites that have little purpose other than to smear, disrupt, or complain about Democratic Underground. Currently there are only three websites that fall into this category. Their addresses are not listed here because we do not wish to give them publicity. They are easily identified by their bizarre obsession with Democratic Underground.
This, to me, seems to be a clear reference to Free Republic.http://www.democraticunderground.com...ss=389x6104139NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Sun Jul-19-09 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. No, it is not a clear reference to Free Republic.
If you saw the other sites, you'd understand the distinction.
There are subforums dedicated to us, with daily comments.
Free Republic mentions us from time to time, just as we do them.
That pretty much answers the rest of my questions!
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
| Bookmarks |
Bookmarks |
