Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1 Americans Are Beginning to Understand the Left 
    HR Corporate Scum patriot45's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Plant City, Florida
    Posts
    10,931
    And it makes our heads hurt!
    The lefty lib retards have a disease. The 0 is just aggravating thier affliction!


    There is only one good thing about the Obama administration's attempts to nationalize most health care and to begin to control Americans' energy consumption through cap-and-trade: clarity about the left. These attempts are enabling more and more Americans to understand the thinking and therefore the danger of the left.

    The left has its first president -- with the possible exception of Franklin Delano Roosevelt -- and for the first time controls the Democratic Party and both houses of Congress. In the name of compassion for the sick and the poor and in the name of preventing worldwide environmental catastrophe, it is attempting to remake America.

    In so doing some principals of the left are becoming clearer to more Americans:

    Principal One: The left, as distinct from traditional liberals, is not, and has never been, interested in creating wealth. The left is no more interested in creating wealth than Christians are in creating Muslims or Muslims in creating Christians. The left is interested in redistributing wealth, not creating it. The left spends the wealth that private enterprise and entrepreneurial risk-taking individuals create.

    The left does not perceive that poverty is the human norm and therefore asks, "Why is there poverty?" instead of asking the economic question that matters: Why is there wealth? And the obvious result of the left's disinterest in why wealth is created is that the left does not know how to create it.

    Principal Two: The reason the left asks why there is poverty instead of why there is wealth is that the left's preoccupying ideal is equality -- not economic growth. And those who are preoccupied with equality are more troubled by wealth than by poverty. Ask almost anyone on the left -- not a liberal, but a leftist like Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi -- which society they consider more desirable, a society in which all its members were equally lower middle class or one in which some were poor, most were middle class, and some were rich (i.e., America today). And whatever they say, in their hearts, the further left they are the more they would prefer the egalitarian society
    continued

    : “Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal.”
    ” Obummercare, 20 percent of the time it works everytime.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,452
    The left, as distinct from traditional liberals, is not, and has never been, interested in creating wealth. The left is no more interested in creating wealth

    I agree.

    Yet, the right wing HAS been interested in creating wealth, and have done so since Reagan, when the taxes for the rich began a slow slide to where we are today, even going as far as Bush's tax cuts for the rich during war time.

    The rightwing has had their thumbs on the scales for decades now, and nobody calls their actions "speading the wealth"

    But when the middle and lower classes want their tax cut, every single republican in congress votes against it.

    The republicans are not for tax cuts, they are for tax cuts for the rich.

    Every republican voted for Reagans tax INCREASE, the largest tax increase the nation had ever seen.

    And...

    Every republican voted against Obamas tax CUT , the largest in our nations history.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    Quote Originally Posted by satanica View Post
    The republicans are not for tax cuts, they are for tax cuts for the rich.

    Every republican voted for Reagans tax INCREASE, the largest tax increase the nation had ever seen.

    And...

    Every republican voted against Obamas tax CUT , the largest in our nations history.
    LINKS? You got proof for these claims? Other than stupid assholes on DU?
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Super Moderator BadCat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In your dreams
    Posts
    15,616
    Quote Originally Posted by satanica View Post
    The left, as distinct from traditional liberals, is not, and has never been, interested in creating wealth. The left is no more interested in creating wealth

    I agree.

    Yet, the right wing HAS been interested in creating wealth, and have done so since Reagan, when the taxes for the rich began a slow slide to where we are today, even going as far as Bush's tax cuts for the rich during war time.

    The rightwing has had their thumbs on the scales for decades now, and nobody calls their actions "speading the wealth"

    But when the middle and lower classes want their tax cut, every single republican in congress votes against it.

    The republicans are not for tax cuts, they are for tax cuts for the rich.

    Every republican voted for Reagans tax INCREASE, the largest tax increase the nation had ever seen.

    And...

    Every republican voted against Obamas tax CUT , the largest in our nations history.
    What "tax cut" was that, Blarch?

    You mean the change in the withholding rate that is just going to decrease your refund next year?

    rm -rf obama*
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    The West
    Posts
    1,618
    Quote Originally Posted by satanica View Post
    The left, as distinct from traditional liberals, is not, and has never been, interested in creating wealth. The left is no more interested in creating wealth

    I agree.

    Yet, the right wing HAS been interested in creating wealth, and have done so since Reagan, when the taxes for the rich began a slow slide to where we are today, even going as far as Bush's tax cuts for the rich during war time.

    The rightwing has had their thumbs on the scales for decades now, and nobody calls their actions "speading the wealth"

    But when the middle and lower classes want their tax cut, every single republican in congress votes against it.

    The republicans are not for tax cuts, they are for tax cuts for the rich.

    Every republican voted for Reagans tax INCREASE, the largest tax increase the nation had ever seen.

    And...

    Every republican voted against Obamas tax CUT , the largest in our nations history.
    Tax credits or refunds, are not tax cuts. We've been over this before. Tax credits are handouts to special interest groups. Perhaps some of the special interest groups might seem worthy, even to republicans, however that doesn't change anything. Tax cuts are by far, fairer than tax refunds. A tax refund increases dependence on the government, whereas a tax cut encourages hard work, thrift and productivity.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
     

  7. #7  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    from the first link in this google search -

    Giving people a tax credit when they pay no taxes in the first place isnt a "tax cut". Its actually welfare payments paid out by the IRS

    DUmbass.
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,452
    Quote Originally Posted by PoliCon View Post
    from the first link in this google search -




    DUmbass.
    You think the lord ordered the non believers to kill his followers. You idiot.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •