Thread: The brutal bottom line
|
-
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 167
-
-
SonnabendGuest
08-07-2009, 10:09 AM
13 years ago is not a "few"
And I am still to see one skerrick of proof to back this up.
Well?
-
08-07-2009, 10:36 AM
Pardon me but...I might not be a died-in-the-wool "birther" but I also see nothing wrong with asking why the President will not produce a valid birth certificate.
McCain was investigated during the campaign for the same reason.
Why is it wrong to ask about Obama?
I take issue with anyone who thinks it's ok that WE have to produce a birth certificate when we need to get a driver's license, but a man who's going to be elected to the highest office in the land shouldn't produce his."It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds."
— Samuel Adams
****
All Sides Political Forums
-
-
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Virginia
- Posts
- 11,840
08-07-2009, 10:48 AM
"Today, [the American voter] chooses his rulers as he buys bootleg whiskey, never knowing precisely what he is getting, only certain that it is not what it pretends to be." - H.L. Mencken
-
08-07-2009, 10:56 AM
Presumption has always worked for me!
-
08-07-2009, 11:17 AM
"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds."
— Samuel Adams
****
All Sides Political Forums
-
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Virginia
- Posts
- 11,840
08-07-2009, 11:18 AM
Then tell me when it has ever been a public disclosure.
"Today, [the American voter] chooses his rulers as he buys bootleg whiskey, never knowing precisely what he is getting, only certain that it is not what it pretends to be." - H.L. Mencken
-
08-07-2009, 11:25 AM
To my knowledge, it hasn't. But, that's because there's never been a question as to where a candidate was born. There was plenty of factual evidence to prove it.
In John McCain's case, his birthplace was looked into due to being born where he was born.
And although I voted for the man, if I had found out before hand that he wasn't eligible according to the constitution, I wouldn't have voted for him.
The constitution oulines the parameters.
WE are in charge. WE decide who gets 'hired" and who doesn't. Not party leadership."It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people’s minds."
— Samuel Adams
****
All Sides Political Forums
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
"Tabasco Sauce Is in a Battle For...
Today, 11:32 AM in The CU Weather Channel