|
|
13 years ago is not a "few"
And I am still to see one skerrick of proof to back this up.
Well?
Pardon me but...I might not be a died-in-the-wool "birther" but I also see nothing wrong with asking why the President will not produce a valid birth certificate.
McCain was investigated during the campaign for the same reason.
Why is it wrong to ask about Obama?
I take issue with anyone who thinks it's ok that WE have to produce a birth certificate when we need to get a driver's license, but a man who's going to be elected to the highest office in the land shouldn't produce his.
Presumption has always worked for me!
Then tell me when it has ever been a public disclosure.
To my knowledge, it hasn't. But, that's because there's never been a question as to where a candidate was born. There was plenty of factual evidence to prove it.
In John McCain's case, his birthplace was looked into due to being born where he was born.
And although I voted for the man, if I had found out before hand that he wasn't eligible according to the constitution, I wouldn't have voted for him.
The constitution oulines the parameters.
WE are in charge. WE decide who gets 'hired" and who doesn't. Not party leadership.
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |