What I don't understand is why some Christians torture themselves by trying to argue that the Great Flood story is supported by scientific evidence. If there was a global flood caused by a God, then the lack of scientific evidence of it should be of no concern to the faithful.
What amazes me about the argument is that baby dinosaurs have been found, still in the remnants of their eggs, in the Gobi Dessert and not one humanís remains have been found from the time of The Great Flood. Whatís up with that?
In fact, in one particular instance, there might be evidence of humans during the time of the dinosaur. I've hunted high and low and can't find the reference now.........But, somewhere, once upon a time, I found an interesting discovery where dinosaur footprints were found in fossilized mud. Several human footprints were found in that same mud, thus leading to the hypothesis that the human was following the dinosaur, or the dinosaur was hunting the human. I can't remember anything more than that. I'm not even sure it was on a legitimate archaeological site or one of the weirdo sites.
Paluxy River, near Glen Rose, Texas. One of the cheesiest carnival scams ever.
The hardest part of the argument for evolutionists is reiterating that things actually change.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|