Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1 Drunken Teen Sex Okay, Trophy Pic Of Same - Not So Much. 
    Drunk teen sex ruled no crime

    UPDATED: 2008-07-15 01:35:54 MST

    Judge says evidence insufficient to prove girl involved didn't consent

    By KEVIN MARTIN, SUN MEDIA

    Email Print Write Size: A A A Share:

    Facebook Digg Del.icio.us Google Stumble Upon Furl Newsvine Reddit Technorati Blinklist Feed Me Yahoo Socializer Ma.gnolia Raw Sugar Simpy Squidoo Spurl Blink Bits Rojo Blogmarks Shadows Netvouz Scuttle Co.mments Bloglines Tailrank Sitejot + Help

    Having sex with a drunken 14-year-old he had plied with alcohol was not a criminal offence by former Calgary man, a judge ruled yesterday.

    Justice Peter McIntyre said there was insufficient evidence the girl didn't consent to having sex with Trevor Byron Niebergall.

    But McIntyre did find Niebergall guilty of sexual assault for placing his genitals on the girl's face after she passed out -- an act the offender captured on his cellphone camera and showed to co-workers.

    McIntyre said the fact the teenage complainant didn't remember her sexual encounter with Niebergall at a December 2005 New Year's Eve party did not mean she hadn't consented.
    I'm thinking the priorities are a little screwed up here.

    Naky Pic
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    Quote Originally Posted by Gingersnap View Post
    I'm thinking the priorities are a little screwed up here.

    Naky Pic
    Nineteen and Fourteen,they grow em fast in Canada !In this country they would have hung him
    on the East Coast and in South Carolina it would be just within the age of consent(That Law was Recently Repealed ) .Some young girls these days are virtually tramps !
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Resident Unliked Meanie Shannon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    5,455
    Quote Originally Posted by megimoo View Post
    Nineteen and Fourteen,they grow em fast in Canada !In this country they would have hung him
    on the East Coast and in South Carolina it would be just within the age of consent(That Law was Recently Repealed ) .Some young girls these days are virtually tramps !

    19 and 14? I doubt they would have hung him in this country. Many girls today are tramps...just like many girls were years ago. Many men are pigs as well...just like they were years ago.
    Loyalty Binds Me- Motto of Richard III
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    noonwitch
    Guest
    19 and 14 meets the 5 year age difference criteria I use to judge whether it is a sex crime or just a couple of dumb teenagers.

    Providing her with alcohol would get him a couple of years in Michigan, all by itself. There was a guy here who accidentally killed a teenager by providing her with alcohol and roofies. He got 20-40 years.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Patent Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    1,784
    UPDATED: 2008-07-15 01:35:54 MST
    They don't have daylight savings time in Canada? Or maybe just lazy reporters who don't know MST from MDT.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,819
    More proof of how f'ed up Canada is getting.
    OPEACHMENT NOW!!!

    Stinger:
    "I was... ordered to drop my pants, bend over and spread my cheeks."
    --RagingInMiami achieving the DUmp's highest level of nirvana
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •