NYT on Acorn coverage; the problem was not liberal bias.

[Apocalypse]

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/27/opinion/27pubed.html

Jill Abramson, the managing editor for news, agreed with me that the paper was “slow off the mark,” and blamed “insufficient tuned-in-ness to the issues that are dominating Fox News and talk radio.” She and Bill Keller, the executive editor, said last week that they would now assign an editor to monitor opinion media and brief them frequently on bubbling controversies. Keller declined to identify the editor, saying he wanted to spare that person “a bombardment of e-mails and excoriation in the blogosphere.”


Despite what the critics think, Abramson said the problem was not liberal bias.

First, who is this unknown editor, and how liberal will he/she be?

And how the hell is the problems of them not wanting to report any thing uncomfortable to the Dims but front paging any thing on the GOP not "Liberal Bias?"

[AmPat]

It's simple, they lie. Liberals lie all the time. They have an ideology based on fantasy and only lies can keep them afloat. That is why quaint little notions like fact and reality are avoided at all cost by liberals, it pokes holes in their belief system. This always conjures up the image of the child sticking his fingers in his ears and Naw-nawing when confronted with an inconvienent fact.

Liberals are morons.;)