Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1 DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce 
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    ALERT! DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce

    Senator Obama was nearly 17 minutes into his July 2, 2008, speech in Colorado Springs, Colorado when he deviated from his pre-released script and performed without the teleprompter net saying:

    "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set.

    We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt2yGzHfy7s

    In January, without any recognizable corporate media coverage, Rep. Bob Filner, a California Democrat, introduced H.R. 675.

    http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h675/show

    The bill would amend title 10 of the United States Code and extend to civilian employees of the Department of Defense the authority to execute warrants, make arrests, and carry firearms.

    The bill was referred to the Armed Services Committee on January 26, 2009. Filner’s bill would amend the United States code with the following: “Sec. 1585b. Law enforcement officers of the Department of Defense: authority to execute warrants, make arrests, and carry firearms… for any offense against the United States.”
    ............................
    The Posse Comitatus Act, passed on June 18, 1878, limits the powers of the federal government to use the military for law enforcement.

    The Act prohibits members of the federal uniformed services from exercising nominally state law enforcement, police, or peace officer powers that maintain “law and order” on non-federal property within the United States.

    ........................
    H.R. 675 sidesteps Posse Comitatus by "(RE)"defining “law enforcement officer of the Department of Defense” as “a civilian employee of the Department of Defense,”
    ............................
    including federal police officers, detectives, criminal investigators, special agents, and game law enforcement officers classified by the Office of Personnel Management Occupational Series 0083

    (the United States Office of Personnel Management is described as an “independent agency” of the U.S. government that manages the civil service of the federal government).
    ....................
    I.E. the authorized personnel is not even military servicemen, but the “chosen” civilians mob.
    .......................................
    The last move on H. R. 675 happened on Mar 15th when it was referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security. The reader might think that this is the end of it, but…
    .........................
    Circumventing any legislative process, just THREE days in new administration reign, "Civilian National Security Force" was already established by Department of Defense Directive 1404.10 (Number 1404.10). This Directive establishes a "DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce" and rescinds a prior directive dealing with the emergency use of civilian personnel.
    ..................................
    The new 1404.10 cancels the prior directive of the same designation ("Emergency-Essential (E-E) DoD U.S. Citizen Civilian Employees"), which was issued in 1992 under President Clinton. The 1992 directive specifically deals with overseas deployments of civilian personnel. It does not mention terms like "restoration of order" or "stability operations", prominently featured in the new directive.
    .........................
    In fact, those functions are central to the mission of President Obama's new DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce:
    ................................
    Members of the DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce shall be organized, trained, cleared, equipped, and ready to deploy in support of combat operations by the military; contingencies; emergency operations; humanitarian missions; disaster relief; restoration of order; drug interdiction; and stability operations of the Department of Defense in accordance with DoDD 3000.05...
    ...................................
    The 1992 directive mentions the term "overseas" no fewer than 33 times. The 2009 directive does not mention the term "overseas" in the body of the directive even once.
    .............................
    While we’re researching a dozen of 1000-page Health Care reform bills, which at worst will kick in in 2013, rallying against Tax&Trade, which nobody even understands, and sending petitions to our “representatives”, who do not listen and simply need to be thrown out of offices next year, the “Civilian” ARMY is quietly being built behind our backs. Who can guess what will be its role at Elections 2010?
    ............................
    http://oathkeepers.ning.com/main/aut...t-dod-civilian
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,000
    Again, I hope this administration gets no more bills passed through Congress.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •