Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20
  1. #1 Are RePukes Really Gonna Strut Over a Couple Gubernatorial Races 
    PORCUS MAXIMUS Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    42,480
    http://www.democraticunderground.com...ss=389x6919541
    tekisui (1000+ posts) Tue Nov-03-09 07:06 PM
    Original message
    Are RePukes Really Gonna Strut Over a Couple Gubernatorial Races in an Off Year?
    Edited on Tue Nov-03-09 07:06 PM by tekisui


    They went from a full majority of the House, Senate and the White House to a minority in all three in just two years(2006-2008). And, now they are going to look at a few gubernatorial races as a national trend? Give me a break.

    2010 starts tomorrow.
    This was predictable.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    eeeevil Sith Admin SarasotaRepub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Sunny,FL
    Posts
    43,440
    Muahahahahahaha!!!111!!! ;)
    May the FORCE be with you!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member Apache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Tree rats are watching you
    Posts
    7,055
    Quote Originally Posted by Rockntractor View Post
    Yes it was...
    As will be the cries of fraud and voter intimidation when they find out the scope of the victories...:D

    The Conservatives did win....right :p
    Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem.
    Ronald Reagan

    We could say they are spending like drunken sailors. That would be unfair to drunken sailors, they're spending their OWN money.
    Ronald Reagan

    R.I.P. Crockspot
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Festivus Moderator ralph wiggum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Springfield, USA
    Posts
    16,898
    If the Dems were winning, you DUmmies would be claiming that it is a validation of 0bama.

    Once again, they're just proving their hypocrisy.
    Last edited by ralph wiggum; 11-03-2009 at 09:20 PM.
    Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member Apache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Tree rats are watching you
    Posts
    7,055
    Quote Originally Posted by ralph wiggum View Post
    If the Dems were winning, you DUmmies would be claiming that it is a validation of 0bama.

    Once again, they're just proving their hypocrisy again.
    Hypocrites?! Never! Short memories, yes. Not hypocrites...


    ;)
    Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem.
    Ronald Reagan

    We could say they are spending like drunken sailors. That would be unfair to drunken sailors, they're spending their OWN money.
    Ronald Reagan

    R.I.P. Crockspot
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    2,123
    tekisui (1000+ posts) Tue Nov-03-09 08:23 PM
    Response to Reply #9
    10. No doubt. If Dems won all three, we would be
    celebrating an endorsement of everything Obama. But
    , seriously, it is hilarious coming from them. I know they have to do it, but in this case, it is pathetic.
    Yep. If all three Dems had one it would be an endorsement of Obama, but if the Republicans win then it's just hilarious that they say that it has meaning.

    Predictible.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Carol View Post
    Yep. If all three Dems had one it would be an endorsement of Obama, but if the Republicans win then it's just hilarious that they say that it has meaning.

    Predictible.
    lets not forget that the m0ssiah - the great and all powerful Obama campaigned for and endorsed the losers . . . . which means their loss is clearly Bush's fault.
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member Dan D. Doty's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Pevely, Missouri
    Posts
    3,010
    Just seeing Moonbats pissed off ... priceless :D
    CU's Paranormal Expert.


    Keep your powder dry, your sword sharp and your wits intact.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Sonnabend
    Guest
    A portent of things to come....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Power CUer noonwitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Warren, MI
    Posts
    12,890
    Michigan will probably have a republican governor after next year's election. That doesn't mean Michigan won't go for Obama in 2012. Michigan voted for Clinton during the Engler administration, and Detroit has turned up big in the last 3 or 4 elections, which they didn't do in the 80s or early 90s.


    The dems don't have a strong candidate, since Dennis Archer opted out of the running. I'd like to see Wayne County prosecutor Kym Worthy make a run for it, but she is not so well-known outside of metro Detroit (except as the woman who took Kwame down), and may choose to run for AG first, if she has higher ambitions. Debbie Stabenow is pretty popular as a Senator and probably wouldn't leave to run for governor, and Levin may be retiring from the Senate, but he will be retiring overall, most likely.

    The GOP has one pretty strong candidate (Hoekstra), a wild card (Nugent) and an over-reaching adulterer (Cox). I was hoping Terri Lynn Land would run, because I would have probably crossed party lines and voted for her in both the primary and the general, unless the dems find a better candidate.


    Detroit had a mayoral election yesterday, and a city council election. The ex-cop who sued the city and exposed Kwame (Gary Brown) had the second-most votes for city council. A lot of incumbents lost their seats, and three of the good ones kept theirs. Dave Bing won a term as mayor.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •