|
|
Didn't Uganda have some success with a variant of this program, actually managing to lower the AIDS rates for a couple years, but when they changed the course of the education, they shot back up again. . .?
~QC
No - with education and social pressure.
And yet they are not nearly as effective at both as simple abstinence. How many women can you point to who have gotten pregnant while abstaining from sex? How many can people contract STDs while abstaining from sex? In both cases - the empirical evidence is much greater in favor of abstinence.Condoms and birth control have an empirically verified track record of reducing unwanted pregnancy and disease, ipso facto.
absitence? What's that?Promoting absitence without birth control has an empirically verified track record of increasing the contraction of STD's along with unwanted pregnancy.
Regardless of the little statistics that wilbur loves to throw out, he has yet to show me a single person who, while remaining in abstinent, ever produced an unwanted child or contracted an STD that didn't involve forced intercourse or a medical mishap. The motivation behind the sexual education adherents is a desire for sex on demand with no responsibility for the consequences of choices made. I am pro-choice, but the choice I support is the one made a little sooner in the process so that later on a choice doesn't have to be made to kill a child. Likewise many who support abortion with no limitations tends to be a group of self aborbed individuals whose interest in their own hedonism trumps the life of the offspring they create and the health of those they exchange bodily fluids with.
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |