
Originally Posted by
jay howard
Just trying to get an idea what you mean by "Marxist" as it gets thrown around with a lot of gusto around here.
The premise of the article is laughable to begin with, however. How is it that when someone wants to say that market insecurities from the war are the major culprit in rising oil prices, they are branded as oversimplifying petroleum economics (a statement I fully agree with), yet, if they want to say high gas prices are the dem's fault because they are tyrannical at their core (??), that passes without a hint of skepticism?
Does the original article, in your opinion, count as a thoughtful analysis of world politics or does it just make you feel like your not alone in your club?
..