Thread: GORE: 'It's important we change the laws'...

Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1 GORE: 'It's important we change the laws'... 
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    GORE: 'It's important we change the laws'...

    While it's important that people change their light bulbs, it's even more important that we change the laws."

    WASHINGTON - President George W. Bush on Monday slammed a bill on combating climate change being debated by the U.S. Senate this week. Here are some comments from Bush and other prominent U.S. politicians on the bill:

    PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: Warner-Lieberman bill which would impose roughly $6 trillion of new costs on the American, There's a much better way to address the environment than imposing these costs on the job creators which will ultimately have to be borne by American consumers.

    snip

    SEN. BARBARA BOXER, CALIFORNIA: "Just when we finally have a chance to get off of Big Oil and foreign oil, you can count on the Bush administration to fight us every step of the way.

    CALIFORNIA'S REPUBLICAN GOV. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER:
    "Last year was one of the warmest on record ... snip I urge you and you and your colleagues in the Senate to work together for passage of a bill that, combined with the leadership of states such as California, can help form a truly national climate change strategy."

    AL GORE, FORMER VICE PRESIDENT AND NOBEL PEACE LAUREATE: "... We have the first global warming bill in history that is comprehensive, bipartisan and that enjoys support across the country -- snip
    Of course the bill needs to be stronger

    Yeh Right and cost the entire Gross National Product to implement, right al ?

    BILL KOVACS, U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE:
    "What is currently drafted just isn't realistic. Among the bill's many flaws, the business community recognizes that the necessary technologies aren't currently available to meet the demands of the bill. So while we reduce use of fossil fuels, what energy sources do we use to run the economy until we develop and deploy the new technologies?

    TOM COCHRAN, U.S. CONFERENCE OF MAYORS: "This is a critical time for our nation as we continue to seek solutions for our growing energy crisis and to confront fully the growing global climate change challenge. This new initiative will not only help transform America's cities, but is a critical part of any successful national effort to reduce carbon emissions."
    http://www.reuters.com/articlePrint?...29748720080602
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Quote Originally Posted by megimoo View Post
    GORE: 'It's important we change the laws'...

    While it's important that people change their light bulbs, it's even more important that we change the laws."

    Yeah, we need to drill for more oil in this country, and build more nuclear power plants.

    WASHINGTON - President George W. Bush on Monday slammed a bill on combating climate change being debated by the U.S. Senate this week. Here are some comments from Bush and other prominent U.S. politicians on the bill:

    PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: Warner-Lieberman bill which would impose roughly $6 trillion of new costs on the American, There's a much better way to address the environment than imposing these costs on the job creators which will ultimately have to be borne by American consumers.

    snip

    SEN. BARBARA BOXER, CALIFORNIA: "Just when we finally have a chance to get off of Big Oil and foreign oil, you can count on the Bush administration to fight us every step of the way.

    The only way to get off of foreign oil is to produce more of it here.


    CALIFORNIA'S REPUBLICAN GOV. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER:
    "Last year was one of the warmest on record ... snip I urge you and you and your colleagues in the Senate to work together for passage of a bill that, combined with the leadership of states such as California, can help form a truly national climate change strategy."

    AL GORE, FORMER VICE PRESIDENT AND NOBEL PEACE LAUREATE: "... We have the first global warming bill in history that is comprehensive, bipartisan and that enjoys support across the country -- snip
    Of course the bill needs to be stronger

    Yeh Right and cost the entire Gross National Product to implement, right al ?

    BILL KOVACS, U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE:
    "What is currently drafted just isn't realistic. Among the bill's many flaws, the business community recognizes that the necessary technologies aren't currently available to meet the demands of the bill. So while we reduce use of fossil fuels, what energy sources do we use to run the economy until we develop and deploy the new technologies?

    TOM COCHRAN, U.S. CONFERENCE OF MAYORS: "This is a critical time for our nation as we continue to seek solutions for our growing energy crisis and to confront fully the growing global climate change challenge. This new initiative will not only help transform America's cities, but is a critical part of any successful national effort to reduce carbon emissions."
    http://www.reuters.com/articlePrint?...29748720080602


    I can't believe, that with the price of oil this high, politicians try to offer a bill like this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    Quote Originally Posted by mark1 View Post

    I can't believe, that with the price of oil this high, politicians try to offer a bill like this.
    Our liberal Congress purchased and fully paid for by Tree Huggers of America Are Us !
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •