I loved this line from Rasmussen on polling showing people are increasingly against this stuff.
President Obama flew to Denmark at week’s end on an urgent mission to bring consensus to the United Nations summit on global warming, but many voters just don’t see the problem the way the president and other world leaders do.
Wilbur likes to call people here dolts on Global Warming but he's missing the point that the Mother Earth seems to be making fools of the "scientists" that seem hellbent to save "her" by ruining this country's economy. POTUS coming home from a Global Warming Conference--greeted by a blizzard??? Too funny.
I'm wondering if anyone expected the GW groups to just give up? Of course they won't. They won't if a mini ice age started tomorrow, they'd simply call it a
"micro-trend" or some other term. GW would always be lurking...just behind
the ice sheet. :D
Wilbur, the GW groups are on the defensive and protesting a tad too much. I'm pretty good at smelling a con job and con jobs always involve big money. GW is big money.
Cold is just another kind of warm.
DC is expected to get several inches of global warming tonight. The Nashville airport is reporting several delays due to global warming. Soldiers are stuck in airports in Chicago, Detroit, New York and DC due to global warming.
Where is Gore and Wilbur, please help, help us or we are doomed. :D
Yeah yeah, they are all in the pay of "big oil"...and of course there is no proof of this stupid assertion other than the "conspiracy angle" which is yet another lie.Perhaps you should turn your nose towards the big money on the other side - money interests with orders of magnitude more dollars at stake than any scientist jockeying for grant money. What do you smell there?
You're the one making allegations.The "conspiracy angle" is the one note tune of the anti-global warming crowd, are you fucking serious?
No, I am asking you to substantiate thisIt seems only natural they should see them other places as well..
Prove it.Perhaps you should turn your nose towards the big money on the other side - money interests with orders of magnitude more dollars at stake than any scientist jockeying for grant money. What do you smell there?
And by the way, Mr Expert, just what ARE your qualifications in climatology?
What makes you think this is particularly unique. It is only unique if you cherry-pick the time frame. If you look to the longer history, it not only is not very unique, it is rather MILD.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|