Ad hominum's are not valid rebuttal's.
I just gave you eye-witness accounts!
Let me know when you come back with your recent departure from this conversation.
WTF are you talking about? Who's "she"? And what was takin' at "face value"?
Of coarse I do, but if you don't give me any reason to think the contrary, why should I? I would love for someone to show proof these stories are not true. But no one seems to be able to do that. They just get all emotional and personally attack anyone bringing up these issues. Which, in turn, leaves me to believe the stories are true.
I haven't said anything about the military, just the policy behind it. What is your opinion of Veteran's for Peace or IVAW? Do you support those troops?
I was never in the military. I did play pop warner football once.
The article didn't say what ideology the doctor was. But doctor's try to save lives, so they are a credible source for finding out how people die. And he was an eye-witness on the scene. You show me someone else who was there, that said different. Were you there? Then shut your fuckin' mouth, cause you don't know what you're talking about!
Then how did 24 Iraqi men, women and children die of gun shot wounds? Why did the military say initially the people died in a fire fight, when there were no bullet holes on the exterior of the building? Why did the military change their story after the fact? Why did no one believe the 9 year girl who was there and testified to the summary executions carried out by the marines? You wanna answer those?
Then what are we doing there?
So what? It doesn't justify attacking a country that had not attacked yours.
So you wanna talk idiots, do ya?
How 'bout this one?
I'm not a dem.











