Here is the problem:
Brown's win will only give enough votes to stop the Dems plans but not enough votes to pass anything. So the Dems will spend the next 2 years proposing the same marxist crap, the repubs will stop it, things will get worse, through no fault of the repubs. The Dems will then blame it on the "party of no."
If the Repubs take over the House, which I think they will in 2010, the Democrats will only have till the end of this year to pass socialistic legislation rather than 2 years. Anything that gets passed while the Democraps have a majority in both houses and the Presidency will be almost impossible to overturn. So I am not worried about who, what or where blame is placed.
This is a tough call, a really tough call. Patrick Kennedy was campaigning for Coakley. Kennedy repeatedly referred to her as Marcia, but her name is Martha. Secondly, he tells Massachusetts citizens they have to vote for MARCIA Coakley to solve the problems Bush caused.
Now here is my dilemma. I can't decide which of these two scenarios best describes Kennedy as the frikking idiot he is or the frikking idiots he thinks the citizens of Massachusetts are. This is a tough one but don't worry, I will figure it out.
"The Democrats are in deep shit even if Marcia wins."
That the Kennedys are idiots goes without saying.
Last edited by obx; 03-21-2011 at 06:02 PM.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|