Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1 What Scott Brown needs to do to beat Martha Coakley. 
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    Massachusetts Election Results: What to Watch For
    What Scott Brown needs to do to beat Martha Coakley.


    Assuming that the Massachusetts election results page (update: see results here) doesn't crash due to a tremendous amount of traffic, what should one be looking for after the polls close at 8:00 p.m. and numbers begin pouring in?

    1) Western Mass
    - Coakley needs a huge margin out of what I call the "Rachel Maddow Belt" - the Berkshires, where she has roots, and the Pioneer Valley. She probably needs a 5,000 vote lead out of Amherst and high turnout in places like Springfield, Pittsfield, and Northampton.

    2) The I-495 Ring - This is Brown's bread and butter, and he needs to rack up big leads in towns like Haverhill, Dracut, Marlborough, and his home area near Wrentham and Foxborough. These are the places where Mitt Romney broke through to win the governorship in 2002.

    3) The Cape and Southeastern Mass
    - The Kennedy belt. Barnstable and Plymouth Counties are presumably the places where Kennedy's memory ought to rescue Coakley in the eleventh hour. Brown will probably narrowly win the TOWNS of Plymouth and Barnstable, which are usually bellwethers. If Coakley carries either, she will probably be on her way to winning statewide. If Brown wins both with more than 55%, watch out.

    4) The 8th CD - The heart of liberal Massachusetts needs to come out in a big way for Coakley if she is to have a shot. Cambridge should turn out dependably, but will the Boston machine crank out votes at the same rate as other places in the state? Will Capuano's voters be as enthusiastic about this race after they didn't get their man?

    5) The Catholic south shore - Will working class Democrats stick with their party or defect to Brown? This is the key area to watch in that respect. Brown will probably win Braintree and Weymouth, but the town to watch is Quincy. If Coakley can't hold onto Quincy, she will probably lose.

    6) The ethnic cities - Does Coakley get at least half of Obama's votes in each of Worcester, Fall River, New Bedford, Lowell, and Lawrence? These are places that will vote Democratic 2-to-1 or more, but where voters need lots of engagement to mobilize.

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/...lts-what-watch
    Last edited by megimoo; 01-19-2010 at 08:35 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    PORCUS MAXIMUS Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    42,144
    I think your a little late with this one Mr. Moo!:D
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Yeah, it looks like he's ahead even without the crucial man-hair lesbian vote. :D
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    Quote Originally Posted by Rockntractor View Post
    I think your a little late with this one Mr. Moo!:D
    Only twenty one percent in .The post was to enable those who watch the voting trends to understand whats going on with the Voting Dynamics.

    The health care bill was the deciding issue that shifted the votes to Brown,
    The people are angry about having this thing stuffed down their throats.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •