Results 1 to 5 of 5

Hybrid View

  1. #1 Apple iPad Shortcomings Spark Questions About Updates 
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    If you time-traveled back to 1995, and asked the leading futurists of that time where our machines were soon to take us, you might well have heard just as much rhapsodizing about document-centric interfaces as that about hypertext and the World Wide Web.

    The first generation of software interfaces forced the user to think too much about the tools, the story went, and too little about the task. If you wanted to write a memo, you had to think, "First I must launch Microsoft Word, my tool, and then create a new document."

    If you wanted to embed some piece of information that Microsoft Word wasn't optimized for, you had to launch another application, create and modify a new element there, and then move back to your original application environment, where you could deposit the alien data object.

    A number of proposed interfaces - most famously, Apple's failed OpenDoc initiative, shut down shortly after the company acquired NeXT - promised to reverse the priorities: our desktops would prioritize the tasks over the tools, the documents over the applications. The user wouldn't launch documents inside an application.

    They'd just create a document on its own, which would lie there like a surgical patient, and if you needed a specific tool - a little word-processing here, or some video-editing there - you just grabbed that tool and started working on the patient in front of you. In the application-centric model, you were constantly lugging organs into other operating rooms and then dragging them back.

    The weird thing about the iPad is that it has landed us 180 degrees from where we thought we were heading. The iPad interface - like the iPhone's - tries to do everything in its power to do away with documents and files. There is no Finder or root-level file navigation.

    It's apps, apps, apps, as far as the eye can see. According to the demo last week, the main way to launch iWork documents is by an internal document-selection process after launch, where your files are presented to you in a gallery format. (See pictures of the iPad's unveiling.)

    I truly don't know how I feel about this. It might be genius. Maybe most users are more confused by Finders and File Explorers than I've realized. But I can't help thinking that if the iPad really wants to be a device that you might take on a business trip instead of the laptop, it's going to need a little more document-centrism.

    By a wide margin, the most disappointing element of the user interface, or UI, is the home screen, which is virtually unchanged from the original iPhone UI. (The iPad is far, far more than a blown-up iPod Touch, but you can't tell from the home screen.)

    Surely there's a better way to exploit multitouch and that extra screen real estate for navigating all the information that will be stored on these machines.

    I have no inside information on this, but given the inventiveness of the iWork user experience, I can't help thinking that an iPad-native home environment was a project that didn't make the ship dates, and that they slapped on the old iPhone screen for continuity at the last minute. But time will tell.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/2010020...95821700/print
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    I don't think this guy is the target demographic. I think I'm the target demographic. I wouldn't want one of these to use for work or to use for document processing - I have way more powerful and convenient tools for all that.

    This is a recreational interface for people like me. Sometimes I want the ability to comfortably surf or do leisure reading while I'm out and about. I don't want to squint at a phone and I don't want to drag a laptop around. I'd like something light and thin (and cool) that I could use in a coffee shop, park, or bookstore. I might want to use it in my backyard in the summer while enjoying a frosty adult beverage. Whatever I use it for, I would want it to be easy to hold with one hand and I'd want it to fit easily in a tote or backpack.

    This sounds like that product to me. :)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member Full-Auto's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    651
    I'm a fan of Apple and Mac's... and the iPhone. But the iPad is a bad joke. I was seriously let down by it's complete lack of ingenuity and forward thinking. It's a neat toy, but certainly nothing I can use for serious work.

    Oh well, I'll have fun watching movies in bed with it vs. my iPhone. Well worth the $500 I'll pay for the bare bones version.
    I like to shoot people with my CANON.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    BSR
    Guest
    saw this on DU and thought it was pretty funny.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Power CUer FlaGator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Swamps of N. Florida
    Posts
    22,268
    As much as I am enthused about the iPad, I think I'll save my money for the next generation. Hopefully it will have some useful enhancements like multitasking.

    I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.
    C. S. Lewis
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •