Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1 Can They Make Obamacare Worse? Yes They Can! 
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    Flacking for President Barack Obama’s “new” health care plan, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters assembled for yesterday’s press briefing: “The president posted ideas of his on the White House website today. We hope Republicans will post their ideas either on their website, or we’d be happy to post them on ours, so that the American people could come to one location and find out the parameters of what will largely be discussed on Thursday.” And this might have been a small bit of successful Obama administration gamesmanship on health care and transparency in government except for one small problem: reality. Not only do House Republicans already have their own health care plan, not only is it already available online, but the White House’s own website already links to it!

    And speaking of the President’s behind-closed-doors plan, don’t believe any of those headlines showing a $950 billion price tag. That is an Obama administration-created number that should not be afforded any more credibility than Gibbs’ grasp of the contents of his own website. In fact, the independent Congressional Budget Office (CBO) published this about the President’s new plan yesterday:

    Preparing a cost estimate requires very detailed specifications of numerous provisions, and the materials that were released this morning do not provide sufficient detail on all of the provisions. Therefore, CBO cannot provide a cost estimate for the proposal without additional detail, and, even if such detail were provided, analyzing the proposal would be a time-consuming process that could not be completed this week.

    In other words, even with over a year to prepare for the moment they would finally release their own plan, the White House could only manage to obtain an “incomplete” grade from the official budget scorekeeper in Washington. So every time you hear the President say “my plan is paid for” or “my plan reduces the deficit,” just remember you are going to have to take his word for it.

    And where the President’s plan is more firm than fuzzy, it only makes the scheme worse:

    Cornhusker Kickback for All: Instead of just eliminating the Cornhusker Kickback, the White House chose to solve their Medicaid problem by extending the deal to all 50 states. Now all new Medicaid spending through 2017 and 90% after 2020 will be picked up by the feds.

    Weakens and Delays Cost Control: The White House’s proposal is silent on whether all collective bargaining agreements will be exempt from Obamacare’s new health insurance tax, but the new plan does go ahead and weaken what was the only thing in the entire bill that even liberal health care experts thought had a chance of containing health care costs. The plan delays implementation of the new tax until 2018 (when President Obama is well out of office) and raises the threshold for taxation to $27,000.

    Steals More Money from Medicare: To pay for Cornhusker Kickbacks for all, increased subsidies for health insurance, and the health insurance tax delay, the White House raises the Medicare payroll tax and extends it for the first time ever to investment income. This new $120 billion in taxes should be used to help plug Medicare’s existing $38 trillion unfunded liability, not fund a brand new entitlement.

    CONTINUED
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Best Bounty Hunter in the Forums fettpett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Southwest Michigan (in Exile)
    Posts
    8,757
    Quote Originally Posted by PoliCon View Post
    Cornhusker Kickback for All: Instead of just eliminating the Cornhusker Kickback, the White House chose to solve their Medicaid problem by extending the deal to all 50 states. Now all new Medicaid spending through 2017 and 90% after 2020 will be picked up by the feds.
    what happened to the other 7 states? they need the kickback as well
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    Quote Originally Posted by fettpett View Post
    what happened to the other 7 states? they need the kickback as well
    ya know . . . that's a good question!
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    11,970
    Quote Originally Posted by fettpett View Post
    what happened to the other 7 states? they need the kickback as well
    I am guessing that this brainiac we have for a Prez thought that Guam, P.R., American S., etc were states. To think Dan Q. was murdered in the press for putting an e on potato. The Magic Negro puts Bubba to shame in the lying department.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Sonora, Texas
    Posts
    4,117
    The stupidity of Obama is not more clear than in this. WE DON'T WANT THIS SHIT! And he can't wrap his head around it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Speedy View Post
    The stupidity of Obama is not more clear than in this. WE DON'T WANT THIS SHIT! And he can't wrap his head around it.
    He doesn't CARE if we like it or not.
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Best Bounty Hunter in the Forums fettpett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Southwest Michigan (in Exile)
    Posts
    8,757
    all he cares about is his legacy, this Shitcare bill is his legacy. you can see that in his handleing of foreign affairs, he's pissed off the Chinese, ignored the Iranians. the Europeans love him (if thats not a sign of idioticy idk what is) tried to put a dictator incharge of a country that had Democraticly elected President.

    oh, and i dont think we have enough terriotry to make 7 more states, unless some of Mexico, Canada, or Iraq/Afganhiastan/Isreal is put in there LOL
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •