Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15
  1. #11  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Woodland Park, Colorado, United States
    Posts
    8,563
    onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts)
    18. I don't care what people wear. But teabaggers do. That's the point.

    Whatever fuel helps make them run a teabagger candidate against Senator Softcore in 2012 is fine with me.
    No Liar! The point is you are a hypocrit. You ridicule somebody for wearing pink shorts and call Tea Partiers "Tea Baggers." If you don't care why are you using a derogatory term for deviant behavior and bringing up pink shorts? Closet Homosexual are you? Self loathing due to your latent homosexual tendencies? Why don't you come on over here for a dose of reality? COWARD!:mad:
    Education without values, as useful as it is, seems rather to make man a more clever devil.
    C. S. Lewis
    Do not ever say that the desire to "do good" by force is a good motive. Neither power-lust nor stupidity are good motives. (Are you listening Barry)?:mad:
    Ayn Rand
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Power CUer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    11,488
    Quote Originally Posted by NJCardFan View Post
    Just another childish act by the DUmp. The man wore pink shorts. Who the hell gives a flying fuck.
    You'd be all over it if it were Chuck Schumer. :p
    "Today, [the American voter] chooses his rulers as he buys bootleg whiskey, never knowing precisely what he is getting, only certain that it is not what it pretends to be." - H.L. Mencken
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    11,970
    Quote Originally Posted by linda22003 View Post
    You'd be all over it if it were Chuck Schumer. :p
    The pink part, no. Spending $750 on a pair of shorts, you bet your sweet ass I would be all over it. That's worse than a gal buying an extravagant designer purse.:)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    Quote Originally Posted by lacarnut View Post
    The pink part, no. Spending $750 on a pair of shorts, you bet your sweet ass I would be all over it. That's worse than a gal buying an extravagant designer purse.:)
    You bet it's worse. Those bags usually start at $1500. :p
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    meh. Pink leather shorts on a male model in the 1980s is nothing. I'm more worried about the pink spendex shorts on bubba - TODAY. *shudder*
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •