Thread: Who ''Lost'' Vietnam?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1 Who ''Lost'' Vietnam? 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,800
    It'll be 35 years on April 30th since Saigon fell to the Communists. The war defined an era and a whole generation and in many ways it's shadow has hung over our foreign policy--And some have compared our situations in Iraq and Afghanistan to Vietnam, though the comparison is debatable. Who can we blame for the loss of Vietnam--LBJ? Nixon? Gerald Ford? The Congress? The Generals? Henry Kissinger? McNamara? The Anti-War protestors? The troops? Or America itself?
    What's your opinion--Who do you think 'lost' Vietnam and what do you think looking back could've enabled us to win the war--or if not 'win' the war, at least keep S. Vietnam an intact non-communist state?
    I ask because...The shadow does still loom and maybe we can learn from Vietnam, and perhaps what we learn from the mistakes made could help us to win now. It'd have made the sacrifice of the 58,000 who died to not have been in vain--that the loss of their lives then could save the lives of others now--along with the hundreds of thousands or millions who died after the Fall.
    Last edited by CaughtintheMiddle1990; 03-02-2010 at 12:20 AM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    PORCUS MAXIMUS Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    41,078
    All that died.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Zoomie djones520's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    10,049
    Quote Originally Posted by Rockntractor View Post
    All that died.
    So true unfortunately. Hundreds of thousands of dead soldiers for nothing at all.
    Last edited by djones520; 03-02-2010 at 12:14 AM.
    In most sports, cold-cocking an opposing player repeatedly in the face with a series of gigantic Slovakian uppercuts would get you a multi-game suspension without pay.

    In hockey, it means you have to sit in the penalty box for five minutes.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Zoomie djones520's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    10,049
    35,000 CITM? US Deaths alone numbered more then 58,000 with South Vietnamese forces suffering 220,000 dead, and over a million dead South Vietnamese civilians.
    In most sports, cold-cocking an opposing player repeatedly in the face with a series of gigantic Slovakian uppercuts would get you a multi-game suspension without pay.

    In hockey, it means you have to sit in the penalty box for five minutes.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    15,312
    Why does it seem like all of the threads started by caughtinthemiddle are homework assignments? And if you want to point fingers, I vote Walter Cronkite.
    "Inequality is a false notion propagated by those who are made to feel guilty for what they have by those who are jealous for what they don't"-Former MTV Host Kennedy
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Minneapolis MN
    Posts
    621
    Besides the troops that died, South Vietnam and American, the people who lost were the ones that were forced to flee, or were killed after the US pulled out.

    My wife's family were among those that were forced to flee into Thialand.
    Liberals are proof that evolution is only a theory. Nothing that stupid could evolve past a monkey.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,800
    Quote Originally Posted by NJCardFan View Post
    Why does it seem like all of the threads started by caughtinthemiddle are homework assignments? And if you want to point fingers, I vote Walter Cronkite.
    They aren't homework assignments, simply stuff I like talking about. I'm one of those thinking types--I think it'd be funnier to talk about such things than ''let's bash Libs/Conservatives/Libertarians today and argue over whose ideology is better''
    Vietnam was the most important conflict in modern history (at least for us in America), and it still does effect foreign policy and seeing as the anniversary of it's end looms I figured we could discuss it and maybe..idk..learn something from it.
    And yes, Walter was an SOB. He purposefully undermined the war effort and morale. I think there's a quote by LBJ in which upon hearing of Cronkite's broadcast felt that now ''middle America'' or his base would turn against the war.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Resident Grump
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    7,767
    Go do your own homework.

    They aren't homework assignments, simply stuff I like talking about. I'm one of those thinking types
    Rightttt.....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member AlmostThere's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    A Great Red State
    Posts
    1,920
    I'd argue that the first Gulf war was more important than Vietnam. I mean no disrespect to the men and women who sacrificed so much during Vietnam. But if we had never sent advisers, or troops into Vietnam I'm not so sure that we would have seen the domino effect that was feared. On the other hand, allowing Saddam to take Kuwait and possibly other neighbors, would have had an immediate and profound effect on the U.S..
    Better to die on your feet than live on your knees.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Power CUer noonwitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Warren, MI
    Posts
    11,865
    There are so many reasons and contributing factors to why we failed to keep the Vietcong in the north part of the country. I don't like to say that we lost.

    I would say LBJ is more to blame than Nixon, who inherited the situation, at least from the political end of things. I don't think the military was prepared to fight against a loosely-organized army using guerrilla warfare.

    The one story I think of is the one my cousin's ex-hubby told us about one of his experiences-he and his unit were patrolling the jungle and they came across a baby carriage with a baby in it. A couple of his buddies went to get the baby, and bring it back to the base, and the carriage exploded, killing the baby and his fellow soldiers. I don't think the soldiers were prepared for that type of situation, not emotionally. The tacticts used by the Vietcong were inconceivable to americans in the 1960s.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •