Shots Fired at Pentagon; Two Police and Gunman Injured

**djones520** · 03-04-2010, 09:46 PM

Two police officers were injured by a gunman firing shots outside the Pentagon tonight and a suspect is in custody, a police spokesman said.

An aerial view of the Pentagon in Arlington, Va. s seen in this Sept. 2003 file photo. There were reports of two police officers were shot outside the Pentagon Metro station on Thursday, March 4, 2009.
(Andy Dunaway/USAF via Getty Images)The officers' injuries were not life-threatening, police said.

The suspect was injured when police returned fire, according to a Defense Department statement. The extent of the suspect's injuries were not immediately clear.

All three were taken to George Washington Hospital in Washington, a hospital spokeswoman said.

The shooting occurred around 6:35 p.m. at the entrance to the Pentagon Metro Station, which is just outside the Pentagon's main entrance.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/pentagon-sh...ry?id=10014570

**stsinner** · 03-04-2010, 10:01 PM

Jesus Christ... What did he look like?

"Keevill would not identifiy the suspect. " Fucking pussy...

**Rockntractor** · 03-04-2010, 10:12 PM

Originally Posted by stsinner

Jesus Christ... What did he look like?

"Keevill would not identifiy the suspect. " Fucking pussy...

I get pissed when the suspect is still at large and they won't identify for PC reasons.

**Elspeth** · 03-04-2010, 11:07 PM

Originally Posted by Rockntractor

I get pissed when the suspect is still at large and they won't identify for PC reasons.

I don't know if it's PC reasons or national security ones. Let's wait and trust the Pentagon on this one.

**Rockntractor** · 03-04-2010, 11:12 PM

Originally Posted by Elspeth

I don't know if it's PC reasons or national security ones. Let's wait and trust the Pentagon on this one.

You missed my point. I don't care about this one, the suspect has been apprehended, at this point it is none of my concern , merely a curiosity. on the other hand if the suspect were at large a detailed description should be given in order to catch the suspect, a lot of times recently law enforcement and media do not do that.

**Elspeth** · 03-04-2010, 11:26 PM

Originally Posted by Rockntractor

You missed my point. I don't care about this one, the suspect has been apprehended, at this point it is none of my concern , merely a curiosity. on the other hand if the suspect were at large a detailed description should be given in order to catch the suspect, a lot of times recently law enforcement and media do not do that.

Stsinner asked what he looked like and you seemed to be going in the same direction. I agree with you that suspects that are still a danger should have their descriptions released. On this case, though, the Pentagon will take care of it.

**djones520** · 03-05-2010, 03:35 AM

Oh god. Word is the guy was a Truther. His internet postings showed he hated the military, and believed 9/11 was an inside job.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,588074,00.html

Keep an eye out on DU for any missing posters.

Here's a rambling post of his on Wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JPatrickBedell

I'm going to be watching DU like a hawk and see how they try to spin this shit.

Sonnabend · 03-05-2010, 04:00 AM

The user named JPatrickBedell wrote the Sabow case was "a step toward establishing the truth of events such as the September 11 demolitions."

**linda22003** · 03-05-2010, 09:07 AM

Looks like the profile he fit was closest to .... StSinner's. Wonder if "John Patrick Bedell" was the kind of name he was expecting?

**FlaGator** · 03-05-2010, 09:14 AM

I always wonder what the motivation (I'm not saying that there is an alterior motive, its just suspicious) is when people get upset by a lack of a description. Often the description is not given because the police have a good idea who did it and do not want to spook them while the cops close in. I suspect that some people want to know what they look like so that they can be on the look out for them (those that live near the crime scene). Others I feel are looking to have some tightly held belief validated.