Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1 Unique law lets Police Seize Guns Based on Suspicions Alone 
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    Unique law lets police seize guns before a crime is committed

    HARTFORD -- Using a unique state law, police in Connecticut have disarmed dozens of gun owners based on suspicions that they might harm themselves or others.

    The state's gun seizure law is considered the first and only law in the country that allows the confiscation of a gun before the owner commits an act of violence. Police and state prosecutors can obtain seizure warrants based on concerns about someone's intentions.

    State police and 53 police departments have seized more than 1,700 guns since the law took effect in October 1999, according to a new report to the legislature.
    SNIP
    A judge ordered the man's guns returned four months after police seized them. The judge said the police had failed to show the man posed any risk to himself or others. There also was no documented history of mental illness, no criminal record and no history of misusing firearms. "In fact, the firearms were found in a locked safe when the officers executed the warrant," the ruling said.

    Lawlor and Sherman weren't aware of any constitutional challenges to the law, or any state or federal court rulings on the question of its constitutionality.

    Lawlor said there have been no challenges on constitutional grounds because of the way the law was written. "The whole point was to make sure it was limited and constitutional," he said. Sherman said it is because the law is used sparingly, and because a test case would be too costly for average gun owners.

    Lawlor, Crook, and Sherman don't see the legislature repealing or revising the gun seizure law. Pinciaro said Connecticut Against Gun Violence doesn't see any reason why lawmakers should take either action.

    "The bottom line from our perspective is, it may very well have saved lives," Pinciaro said.

    Crook and Sherman said law-abiding gun owners remain at risk while the gun seizure law remains on the statute books.

    "The overriding concern is anybody can report anybody with or without substantiation, and I don't think that is the American way," Crook said.

    http://www.rep-am.com/News/357596.txt
    Last edited by megimoo; 08-03-2008 at 12:06 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member NonConformist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    232
    Oh that is fucking BullShit!!! :mad:
    "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin

    "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants, it is the creed of slaves." -William Pitt




    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Betwixt Member Bubba Dawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    In my own private Alamo on The Mountain in Georgia
    Posts
    13,581
    Dreadful law. It should be challenged in court.

    It doesn't matter at all what theoretical rights you supposedly have based on the constitution when an individual police officer can completely invalidate them and thus render them null based on his or her 'suspicions.'

    If your rights don't exist at street level, then they don't really exist.
    Hey careful man! There's a beverage here!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member Full-Auto's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    651
    Quote Originally Posted by Bubba Dawg View Post
    Dreadful law. It should be challenged in court.

    It doesn't matter at all what theoretical rights you supposedly have based on the constitution when an individual police officer can completely invalidate them and thus render them null based on his or her 'suspicions.'

    If your rights don't exist at street level, then they don't really exist.
    But, but, but it may have saved lives!

    Just think, if we locked everyone in prison on their 14th birthday how many lives we would have saved over the years.
    I like to shoot people with my CANON.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    This is ridiculous -- it is exactly what the fourth and second amendments were made for.
    Last edited by Le Geisha; 08-04-2008 at 11:29 AM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    noonwitch
    Guest
    The law should be very clear about what circumstances the police can confiscate weapons under-if someone writes a suicide threat, for instance, or is armed and stalking another person.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •