Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1 Obama Supports DNA Sampling Upon Arrest 
    Obama Supports DNA Sampling Upon Arrest

    Josh Gerstein over at Politico sent Threat Level his piece underscoring once again President Barack Obama is not the civil-liberties knight in shining armor many were expecting.

    Gerstein posts a televised interview of Obama and John Walsh of America’s Most Wanted. The nation’s chief executive extols the virtues of mandatory DNA testing of Americans upon arrest, even absent charges or a conviction. Obama said, “It’s the right thing to do” to “tighten the grip around folks” who commit crime.

    When it comes to civil liberties, the Obama administration has come under fire for often mirroring his predecessor’s practices surrounding state secrets, the Patriot Act and domestic spying. There’s also Gitmo, Jay Bybee and John Yoo.

    Now there’s DNA sampling. Obama told Walsh he supported the federal government, as well as the 18 states that have varying laws requiring compulsory DNA sampling of individuals upon an arrest for crimes ranging from misdemeanors to felonies. The data is lodged in state and federal databases, and has fostered as many as 200 arrests nationwide, Walsh said.

    The American Civil Liberties Union claims DNA sampling is different from mandatory, upon-arrest fingerprinting that has been standard practice in the United States for decades.

    A fingerprint, the group says, reveals nothing more than a person’s identity. But much can be learned from a DNA sample, which codes a person’s family ties, some health risks, and, according to some, can predict a propensity for violence.

    The ACLU is suing California to block its voter-approved measure requiring saliva sampling of people picked up on felony charges. Authorities in the Golden State are allowed to conduct so-called “familial searching” — when a genetic sample does not directly match another, authorities start investigating people with closely matched DNA in hopes of finding leads to the perpetrator.
    Can you say "Police State"? I knew you could!

    Read More http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/201...#ixzz0hydFwwm8
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Power CUer noonwitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Warren, MI
    Posts
    12,716
    A policy of taking DNA samples from every person arrested for every offense would be abused, once everyone's DNA was in the federal database. I've worked for the government long enough that I can say it would be abused, not that it might be abused.

    The police don't have a problem getting court orders for DNA samples in arrests for sex offenses or for other crimes in which DNA evidence is needed. I don't have a problem with leaving the policy that way.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    No kidding, it would be abused. :mad:
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    132
    but, but… obama's a constitutional law professor, surely he wouldn't suggest something unconstitutional.

    O verly
    B oastful
    A bout
    M inor
    A ccomplishments
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    The MSM would be all over the story had Bush even breathed on such an idea as this.
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Woodland Park, Colorado, United States
    Posts
    8,563
    Tell you what OBlah Blah, I'll make you a deal; You come forth with ALL your hidden records and we'll discuss this.
    Education without values, as useful as it is, seems rather to make man a more clever devil.
    C. S. Lewis
    Do not ever say that the desire to "do good" by force is a good motive. Neither power-lust nor stupidity are good motives. (Are you listening Barry)?:mad:
    Ayn Rand
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member Megaguns91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Warshington
    Posts
    699
    Quote Originally Posted by AmPat View Post
    Tell you what OBlah Blah, I'll make you a deal; You come forth with ALL your hidden records and we'll discuss this.
    Come forth with a birth cert while you're at it, Obummer.
    ...Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Power CUer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    10,005
    Quote Originally Posted by PoliCon View Post
    The MSM would be all over the story had Bush even breathed on such an idea as this.
    You're right about that. And so would our friends at the DUmp. Why does a (D) after your name mean you don't get called out for fascist tendencies?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Elspeth View Post
    You're right about that. And so would our friends at the DUmp. Why does a (D) after your name mean you don't get called out for fascist tendencies?
    because according to the left - Fascism is a conservative trait.
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Power CUer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    10,005
    Quote Originally Posted by PoliCon View Post
    because according to the left - Fascism is a conservative trait.
    They are so easily fooled. Their own inner fascism has actually been on display over there today.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •