Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1 Do you believe Al-Qaida would use a nuke if it could? 
    eeeevil Sith Admin SarasotaRepub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Sunny,FL
    Posts
    43,193
    Interesting post on DU and the results look like a possible "Best Of"...



    ZombieHorde (1000+ posts) Sun Apr-11-10 09:02 PM
    Original message Poll question: Do you believe Al-Qaida would use a nuke if it could?


    http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

    This poll was inspired by the thread contained in the above link.
    BUT!!!


    Hawkeye-X (1000+ posts) Sun Apr-11-10 09:03 PM
    Response to Original message
    1. The question you should ask - does Al Quaeda still exist?
    It's a CIA front.
    Screwball Hawkeye-X sets the tone for a lot of the responses...
    May the FORCE be with you!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    16,142
    Simple answer: Does a shark shit in the sea?
    The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Woodland Park, Colorado, United States
    Posts
    8,563
    Of course. A better question is: what is the source for Al Ka Kaa's 1st nuke?

    I believe it will originate in a former Soviet satellite (Chechnia?) to islamic extremists (Al quaida) by intermediate groups (Hamas?) funded by Iran.
    Education without values, as useful as it is, seems rather to make man a more clever devil.
    C. S. Lewis
    Do not ever say that the desire to "do good" by force is a good motive. Neither power-lust nor stupidity are good motives. (Are you listening Barry)?:mad:
    Ayn Rand
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    PORCUS MAXIMUS Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    42,273
    Quote Originally Posted by AmPat View Post
    Of course. A better question is: what is the source for Al Ka Kaa's 1st nuke?

    I believe it will originate in a former Soviet satellite (Chechnia?) to islamic extremists (Al quaida) by intermediate groups (Hamas?) funded by Iran.
    Iran or Pakistan will provide them with their first nuke.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,071
    Let's see...
    Al Qaeda is a part of a militant sect of Islam (Already a pretty militant religion even for its mainstream practitioners) that values death more than life, seeks to kill as many infidels as possible through their own deaths, and has an entire multitude of nations they would love to try and destroy (i.e. Israel, the US, any ally of either of those nations).
    So, to answer the thread's question:
    In a word, YES!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    PORCUS MAXIMUS Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    42,273
    The question is not will they obtain and use a nuke, it will be who is our commander and chief and how will we retaliate when they detonate it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    eeeevil Sith Admin SarasotaRepub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Sunny,FL
    Posts
    43,193
    You have to love Tom...


    tom_paine (1000+ posts) Mon Apr-12-10 10:21 PM
    Response to Original message
    82. OTHER: Only if the CIA needed another "New Pearl Harbor" to move Bushification alongBut I doubt they'll need to do that. After all, Obama isn't even slowing them down, thus paving the way for the next, more brutally totalitarian (but still, kinder and gentler and more plausibly deniable), Bushification.
    LOL! I'm surprised Skinner hasn't ordered this thread hidden away. :D
    May the FORCE be with you!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    TANSTAAFL. asdf2231's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    The greatest country on Earth.
    Posts
    2,619
    tom_paine (1000+ posts) Mon Apr-12-10 10:21 PM
    Response to Original message
    82. OTHER: Only if the CIA needed another "New Pearl Harbor" to move Bushification alongBut I doubt they'll need to do that. After all, Obama isn't even slowing them down, thus paving the way for the next, more brutally totalitarian (but still, kinder and gentler and more plausibly deniable), Bushification.
    Since it's still going on under Jughead wouldn't that be called "Obamafication" now Tom? :D
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Zoomie djones520's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    10,079
    It's interesting that the majority of the replies say they doubt Al Qaeda even exists, but it's 84% on the poll who believe they would nuke us.
    In most sports, cold-cocking an opposing player repeatedly in the face with a series of gigantic Slovakian uppercuts would get you a multi-game suspension without pay.

    In hockey, it means you have to sit in the penalty box for five minutes.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    16,142
    The fact that that moron is using the name Tom Paine sickens me. These people don't know the first thing about 'Tom' Paine.
    The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •