Thread: Tucker Carlson: Liberals have a problem with Michele Bachmann because she's "effectiv

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1 Tucker Carlson: Liberals have a problem with Michele Bachmann because she's "effectiv 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    1,860
    link

    This is long so I just pasted the relevant 2 paragraphs.

    Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Sat Apr-17-10 09:40 AM

    Original message
    Tucker Carlson: Liberals have a problem with Michele Bachmann because she's "effective"

    Sorry Tucker, but the leaders of the Tea Party movement as we've said time and time again here are the astroturf, industry funded groups paying to promote these rallies and Fox News for helping them along. They don't need a single leader, but Sarah Palin's not it. She's just another useful tool willing to cash in with the sore losermans who are still pissed off because she and McCain lost the election.

    Carlson, par for the course, decided to use Michele Bachmann, another woman he's apparently "impressed with," to take a shot at liberals. Of course the only reason someone would have a problem with her is because she's "effective". Uh...no, Tucker -- the reason people have a problem with her is because, like Palin, she's a bomb-throwing, lying, race-baiting, McCarthy wannabe who's using the same dog-whistle language as Palin to incite the less sane among the masses with absolutely no regard for any of the consequences of her actions and her words.
    Translation: This is "code" for :: She knows how to motivate the base and she tells the truth making our people (progressives and Democrats....especially politicians) look like fools and liars and we can't have that.

    Most of the comments are predictable....full of hatred and vile, but then there are these two.
    OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr-17-10 09:56 AM
    Response to Original message
    9. While I personally am turned off by M. Bachmen, she is effective.

    She draws a crowd and gets attention.

    When people say someone is effective, they are not agreeing
    with the person or their beliefs necessarily, they might
    literally disapprove but they are admitting the person is
    accomplishing their goal.
    Firing up the base and telling the truth. Yep, she's effective.

    onpatrol98 (242 posts)
    Response to Original message
    29. I think its a female thing, actually...

    We're not as vehement about Sean Hannity, Beck, or O'Reilly as we are with Bachmann, Palin or just pick a female. Then again, old Joe the Plumber struck a nerve, too. Mike Pence...I see him on television every day, but he doesn't seem to bring the same amount of venom. Tucker Carlson...now, Tucker seems worthy of extreme heat from us, but he doesn't even generate the same response.

    I'll have to look into this gender politics thing. It's definitely on the right. The venom spewed against Hillary Clinton was downright weird in comparison to other candidates, even from other women. Pelosi gets more heat from the right, than Harry Reid.

    It's not because Bachmann is effective. She isn't. It's because she's female. I think there is an American element, left or right, that wants political women to be quiet UNLESS they agree with us (whoever the us is). Men get a bit more leeway. But, how dare a women differ in opinion.

    A woman who differs in opinion, is stupid, a bad mother, a litany of degrading terms that are unspeakable. I thought we were different from this.

    I do realize some DUers are consistent and gender doesn't matter. But, I also know, down deep, some of this is about gender.
    I think there is an American element on the left that wants political women and Black conservatives to be quiet UNLESS they agree with us (whoever the us is).
    There, that's fixed.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    she's a bomb-throwing, lying, race-baiting, McCarthy wannabe who's using the same dog-whistle language as Palin to incite the less sane among the masses
    Seems there is a pot in despirate need of a kettle.
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Festivus Moderator ralph wiggum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Springfield, USA
    Posts
    16,476
    Sorry Tucker, but the leaders of the Tea Party movement as we've said time and time again here are the astroturf, industry funded groups paying to promote these rallies and Fox News for helping them along.
    Who cares how the movement is now being funded? You DUmmies & libs don't have any grass roots movements either.
    Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8,173
    I agree with onpatrol98. There's a gender aspect to it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Power CUer noonwitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Warren, MI
    Posts
    11,894
    Quote Originally Posted by Elspeth View Post
    I agree with onpatrol98. There's a gender aspect to it.

    To some degree.

    Politics aside, I do think it's funny when people bitch about Hillary's Clinton's shrill voice, but rhapsodize about how much they love hearing Sarah Palin speak. I think Sarah's voice is as shrill as Hillary's, plus she has some really annoying speech habits.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •