Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19
  1. #1 THIS JUST IN - Travellers to be searched for porn 
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    Australian customs officers have been given new powers to search incoming travellers' laptops and mobile phones for pornography, a spokeswoman for the Australian sex industry says.

    Fiona Patten, president of the Australian Sex Party, is demanding an inquiry into why a new question appears on Incoming Passenger Cards asking people if they are carrying "pornography".

    Patten said officials now had an unfettered right to examine travellers' electronic devices, marking the beginning of a new era of official investigation into people's private lives. She questioned whether it was appropriate to search people for legal R18+ and X18+ material.

    “Is it fair that customs officers rummage through someone's luggage and pull out a legal men's magazine or a lesbian journal in front of their children or their mother-in-law?” she said.

    "If you and your partner have filmed or photographed yourselves making love in an exotic destination or even taking a bath, you will have to answer 'Yes' to the question or you will be breaking the law."

    Customs confirmed the new reference to "pornography" on the Incoming Passenger Cards and the search powers, acknowledging that searches conducted by officers may involve the discovery of "personal or sensitive possessions".

    A spokesman said officers were trained to apply "tact and discretion" in their dealings with passengers.

    "Including an express reference to pornography is intended to enhance the interception of prohibited pornography at the border, by making passengers aware that some forms of pornography may be a prohibited import," the spokesman said.

    The "pornography" question has appeared on the cards since September last year. The change was only spotted by Patten earlier this month and it had received little to no coverage in the media.

    Colin Jacobs, chairman of the lobby group Electronic Frontiers Australia, said the change appeared to have sneaked under the radar "without any public consultation about the massive privacy issues".

    "It's hard to fathom what the pressing concern could be that requires Australia to quiz every entrant to the country on their pornography habits, as if visitors would be aware of the nuances of the Australian classification scheme," he said.

    "If this results in Customs trawling through more private information on laptops searching for contraband, I would say the solution is way worse than the problem."

    Patten said if the question was designed to stop child pornography being smuggled into the country then the question should have been asked about "child pornography", without encompassing regular porn.

    Hetty Johnson, chief executive of child protection group Bravehearts, agreed with Patten that the question was too broad. She said it should only apply to illegal pornography.

    "If it said child porn I'd be 100 per cent behind it - if you're carrying child pornography then you deserve everything you get," she said in a phone interview.

    The issue has echoes of the 1956 detention of famed British conductor and composer Sir Eugene Goossens who had his bag searched upon his return from Europe.

    He was carrying material that was considered, at the time, pornographic and his reputation was subsequently ruined, forcing him to flee the country.

    "The term pornography is not referred to at all in the federal Classification Act, which customs relies on to classify their material," Patten said.

    http://www.smh.com.au/technology/tec...0520-vh09.html
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Power CUer noonwitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Warren, MI
    Posts
    13,094
    That's kind of scary. I don't look at porn, but everyone defines what is pornographic by different standards. I've read DH Lawrence's books, and they were once banned in this country for being pornographic. Same with the Marquis DeSade, although I think the reasons his writings were banned are a little more obvious than in the case of Lawrence.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Best Bounty Hunter in the Forums fettpett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Southwest Michigan (in Exile)
    Posts
    8,757
    "Can't be defined, but I'll know it when I see it"

    sounds like a bunch of horny Aussies wanna see what they can confiscate
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Power CUer FlaGator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Swamps of N. Florida
    Posts
    22,435
    What about when you walk through one of those full body scanners? Would that be considered porn?

    I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.
    C. S. Lewis
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    Quote Originally Posted by FlaGator View Post
    What about when you walk through one of those full body scanners? Would that be considered porn?
    They're already saving and printing pictures from those scanners so . . . . .
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Power CUer FlaGator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Swamps of N. Florida
    Posts
    22,435
    Quote Originally Posted by PoliCon View Post
    They're already saving and printing pictures from those scanners so . . . . .
    They were probably on Wiki until this week. :D

    I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.
    C. S. Lewis
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    CU Royalty JB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    8,173
    I'm shocked!!! It's Australia. The same place that wants to ban its citizens from accessing all "offensive" material via the innerwebs.

    Where's sonna? I can feel his frothing about how this will never happen from here.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Hawaii
    Posts
    390
    Quote Originally Posted by JB View Post
    I'm shocked!!! It's Australia. The same place that wants to ban its citizens from accessing all "offensive" material via the innerwebs.

    Where's sonna? I can feel his frothing about how this will never happen from here.
    I'm not surprised. I was talking on some forums about Australia blocking certain online games that the people in the country cannot use. IMHO,i feel that censorship hurts everyone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Sonnabend
    Guest
    I'm shocked!!! It's Australia. The same place that wants to ban its citizens from accessing all "offensive" material via the innerwebs.
    That will die on the vine...it already has, actually. The measure will die as the government will soon be kicked out of office.

    The idea was "shelved" recently (read as "dropped into the circular filing cabinet) Rudd is facing a massive defeat.

    Where's sonna? I can feel his frothing about how this will never happen from here.
    No one is happy with it, and the measure was "sneaked in" by a bunch of fundies. Well, the US and Aust have one thing in common, self righteous, pious,. holier than thou God-botherers, some of them in parliament, who pushed for this measure.

    Considering the hue and cry which has just started...I'd say this will be quietly dropped shortly. The condition is actually in breach of the Privacy Act.
    Last edited by Sonnabend; 05-21-2010 at 05:36 AM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Ape Articulate_Ape's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    NJ, Exit Only
    Posts
    8,006
    /me scratches Australia off of his itinerary.
    "The efforts of the government alone will never be enough. In the end the people must choose and the people must help themselves" ~ JFK; from his famous inauguration speech (What Democrats sounded like before today's neo-Liberals hijacked that party)
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •