I wonder if CU could go two months without another evolution/creation debate?
I fail to see the point in debating something that neither side can prove and neither side can convert the other.
In the following talk, Stephen Hawking states that there is nothing bigger or older than the Universe and that the Universe creating itself out of nothing...
Nice try. I can understand why you want Einstein and Hawking on your side but they aren't.
Last edited by The Night Owl; 08-10-2008 at 10:04 PM.
What can we do to solve this problem? I've got it! You know what would be great?
If there were actually some sort of methodology... some process to weed out mistakes and refine scientific observations, and the theories that explain them... ensuring that as time goes on, our explanations get better and increase with precision. A way that helps us systematically, methodically perceive falsehoods so that we can discard them until only true possibilities remain. Why I think such a thing would be one of the greatest achievements of mankind to date?
If only.... hmmm.
Scratch that, lets just institutionalize our mistakes and call it religion. The other idea sounds like a whole lot of work.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|