Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1 So Now That We Know That The Press Covered For Edwards 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    North of Atlanta
    Posts
    178
    -- just as, pre-invasion, they covered for Saddam -- that raises a question: What else are they not telling us for fear it will hurt the Democrats' prospects?
    Thanks to SarasotaRepub for your help! :D
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member LibraryLady's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    3,748
    The NE says the media had access to their info and chose to ignore it.
    Mondo: Have you ever seen a more blatant–what we’ve called it–”media blackout” of any story the Enquirer has broken than the Edwards affair?

    DP: No. Amazing, simply amazing. It wasn’t a total blackout, but very nearly.

    Mondo: Why do you think this was?

    DP: A couple of things: partly a lack of ability and partly a lack of desire on the part of the media.
    http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2008...onal-enquirer/
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    9,097
    Is it possible that disdain for the Enquirer played a part? The cable networks are bascially gossip services now anyway, and the only way they can feel like they are still "real" journalists is to kick around the Enquirer.
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •