Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Hybrid View

  1. #1 Nato should press on and give Georgia membership 
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    The conflict between Georgia and Russia would have exploded anyway, in some form, were Nato to have pressed ahead with offering Georgia a start on the road to membership, possibly at its meeting at the end of the year. The eruption on Friday should not deter Nato from taking that step soon.

    Of course, many Nato members will consider how, had Georgia already been a member, they would have had to defend it. Germany will win more support for its argument, which dominated the Nato summit in April, that it would be wrong to offer membership for fear of provoking Russia and while its territory remains in dispute. Alarm at this near-war on Europe’s borders will easily persuade more governments of the need for caution.

    That would be wrong. It would tell Russia that it had an effective veto over who joined Nato. It would discourage the pro-American and pro-European spirit of President Saakashvili, elected in 2004 partly for those sentiments. It might even make it harder to agree the deployment of international peacemakers in South Ossetia by showing that the US and Europe were indifferent to Georgia’s case.

    There appear to have been serious miscalculations, more so on the Georgian side. Given the close contact with the US, that might be extended to the US as well. Saakashvili may have deluded himself that four years of US help in equipping his armed forces enabled them to make a dash for their prize. In taking advantage of the distraction of the Olympics, he looks sneaky, and so jeopardises his claim to the moral high ground.



    The Nato summit was a clash of philosophies about Europe’s future. On one side was President Bush, making one of his best speeches, about the value of bringing Georgia and Ukraine into Nato as an assertion of common principles. On the other was Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, laying out why this should be postponed, perhaps for ever, even at the cost of undermining the pro-Western camp in Georgia. (British officials let it be known that they were on the American side in sympathy, but as the US would not win, they were “on the side of compromise”.)



    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle4497302.ece
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    193
    Pretty fucking sad that we have offered them no real help, they came into Iraq with us.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    gator
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Aklover View Post
    Pretty fucking sad that we have offered them no real help, they came into Iraq with us.
    Maybe the reason they did was to incur a little debt from the US.

    We have no business worrying about places like South Ossetia. With hundreds of thousands of troops already deployed on combat missions all over the world the last thing our country needs to do is get involved with another stupid foreign entanglement.

    Since the war has nothing to do with the security of Israel the NeoCons will blow it off. The Liberals don’t even know what is going on. Georgia is pretty well fucked in drumming up American or International support.

    Maybe they could have conjured up a fabrication that the Ossetians were massing weapons of mass destruction that was a threat to Israel and then the American NeoCon war drums would be beating so loud you could hear them all the way to Moscow.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    gator
    Guest
    Maybe we will get involved in it:

    http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=1358

    Israel backs Georgia in Caspian Oil Pipeline Battle with Russia

    DEBKAfile Exclusive Report

    August 8, 2008

    Georgian tanks and infantry, aided by Israeli military advisers, captured the capital of breakaway South Ossetia, Tskhinvali, early Friday, Aug. 8, bringing the Georgian-Russian conflict over the province to a military climax.

    Russian prime minister Vladimir Putin threatened a “military response.”

    Former Soviet Georgia called up its military reserves after Russian warplanes bombed its new positions in the renegade province.

    In Moscow’s first response to the fall of Tskhinvali, president Dimitry Medvedev ordered the Russian army to prepare for a national emergency after calling the UN Security Council into emergency session early Friday.

    Reinforcements were rushed to the Russian “peacekeeping force” present in the region to support the separatists.

    Georgian tanks entered the capital after heavy overnight heavy aerial strikes, in which dozens of people were killed.

    Lado Gurgenidze, Georgia's prime minister, said on Friday that Georgia will continue its military operation in South Ossetia until a "durable peace" is reached. "As soon as a durable peace takes hold we need to move forward with dialogue and peaceful negotiations."

    DEBKAfile’s geopolitical experts note that on the surface level, the Russians are backing the separatists of S. Ossetia and neighboring Abkhazia as payback for the strengthening of American influence in tiny Georgia and its 4.5 million inhabitants. However, more immediately, the conflict has been sparked by the race for control over the pipelines carrying oil and gas out of the Caspian region.

    The Russians may just bear with the pro-US Georgian president Mikhail Saakashvili’s ambition to bring his country into NATO. But they draw a heavy line against his plans and those of Western oil companies, including Israeli firms, to route the oil routes from Azerbaijan and the gas lines from Turkmenistan, which transit Georgia, through Turkey instead of hooking them up to Russian pipelines.

    Saakashvili need only back away from this plan for Moscow to ditch the two provinces’ revolt against Tbilisi. As long as he sticks to his guns, South Ossetia and Abkhazia will wage separatist wars.

    DEBKAfile discloses Israel’s interest in the conflict from its exclusive military sources:

    Jerusalem owns a strong interest in Caspian oil and gas pipelines reach the Turkish terminal port of Ceyhan, rather than the Russian network. Intense negotiations are afoot between Israel Turkey, Georgia, Turkmenistan and Azarbaijan for pipelines to reach Turkey and thence to Israel’s oil terminal at Ashkelon and on to its Red Sea port of Eilat. From there, supertankers can carry the gas and oil to the Far East through the Indian Ocean.

    Aware of Moscow’s sensitivity on the oil question, Israel offered Russia a stake in the project but was rejected.

    Last year, the Georgian president commissioned from private Israeli security firms several hundred military advisers, estimated at up to 1,000, to train the Georgian armed forces in commando, air, sea, armored and artillery combat tactics. They also offer instruction on military intelligence and security for the central regime. Tbilisi also purchased weapons, intelligence and electronic warfare systems from Israel.

    These advisers were undoubtedly deeply involved in the Georgian army’s preparations to conquer the South Ossetian capital Friday.

    In recent weeks, Moscow has repeatedly demanded that Jerusalem halt its military assistance to Georgia, finally threatening a crisis in bilateral relations. Israel responded by saying that the only assistance rendered Tbilisi was “defensive.”

    This has not gone down well in the Kremlin. Therefore, as the military crisis intensifies in South Ossetia, Moscow may be expected to punish Israel for its intervention.

    Maybe we will be pulled into another stupid war for the benefit of Israel. This is a dated article but it shows we are continuing our entanglements.


    http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...89/ai_87509631


    Green Berets now in Georgia: U.S. Special Forces are training Georgian soldiers to fight radical Muslims. The mission could benefit other U.S. interests as well

    VFW Magazine, June-July, 2002 by Tim Dyhouse


    E-mail Print Link President George Bush called the May deployment of some 150 U.S. advisers to Georgia the latest front in the U.S. war on terrorism. Much like their fellow soldiers in the Philippines, U.S. Special Forces are teaching Georgian soldiers how to better fight Muslim extremists within their country. Also, as in the Philippines, U.S. troops are not permitted to engage in combat.

    "So long as there's al Qaeda anywhere, we will help the host countries root them out and bring them to justice," Bush has said.

    Georgia is the first former Soviet republic to train with U.S. troops since Sept. 11. (Several other ex-Soviet states have allowed the use of their airfields.) The mission gives Washington a strategic toehold to help stabilize the oil-rich and volatile Caspian Sea region.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    Quote Originally Posted by gator View Post
    Maybe we will get involved in it:

    http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=1358



    Maybe we will be pulled into another stupid war for the benefit of Israel. This is a dated article but it shows we are continuing our entanglements.


    http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...89/ai_87509631
    Just for the record Gator I didn't post that Israeli stuff ,You did and If it goes on for a few hunderd entrie's don't blame me !
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Patent Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    1,784
    Quote Originally Posted by megimoo View Post
    Germany will win more support for its argument, which dominated the Nato summit in April, that it would be wrong to offer membership for fear of provoking Russia
    Maybe I am confused with something else...but wasn't opposing Russia the reason NATO was created?!?!?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Banned - Not really Theo
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    On the river
    Posts
    136
    Quote Originally Posted by biccat View Post
    Maybe I am confused with something else...but wasn't opposing Russia the reason NATO was created?!?!?
    I think it was conceived like the useless UN as just another vehicle to pick the pocket of the US taxpayer.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Goldwater
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by biccat View Post
    Maybe I am confused with something else...but wasn't opposing Russia the reason NATO was created?!?!?
    It was created to stop the Soviet Union. It is outdated for the current state of affairs.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Patent Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    1,784
    Quote Originally Posted by Goldwater View Post
    It was created to stop the Soviet Union. It is outdated for the current state of affairs.
    I suppose you're right. NATO was only relevant when Russia was bullying her weaker neighbors into submission by economic, political, and military forces.

    None of that going on anymore.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Goldwater
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by biccat View Post
    I suppose you're right. NATO was only relevant when Russia was bullying her weaker neighbors into submission by economic, political, and military forces.

    None of that going on anymore.
    Not bullying, when it had enslaved half of Europe and the percieved threat of communism as an idealogy was at America and Western Europe's door step.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •