Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1 Lawmaker Asks Congressmen to Pledge Not to Hold a Post-Election Lame-Duck Session 
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,322
    Monday, August 09, 2010
    By Fred Lucas, Staff Writer

    (CNSNews.com) – Republicans, insisting that nothing good can come of a lame-duck session of Congress, are urging Congress not to resume business as usual after the midterm election.

    Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) introduced a resolution, “Pledging not to assemble on or between the dates of November 2, 2010 and January 3, 2011, except in the case of an unforeseen, sudden emergency requiring immediate action from Congress.”



    If Democrats lose control or one or both houses of Congress – as many political analysts are predicting -- the losing members could vote on unpopular legislation without worrying about being accountable to voters.

    Republicans believe Democrats will use the lame duck session in an attempt to pass unpopular legislation such as cap and trade, card check, immigration reform and tax hikes.

    Indeed, Democratic leaders in Congress appear to be headed down that path.

    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is expected to schedule a lame duck session on Nov. 15, according to The Hill newspaper. The Hill also reported that House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said that the decision on how and whether to extend the Bush tax cuts might be delayed until a lame duck session.

    “The question is, would the folks who have been defeated feel liberated from being responsible to their constituents?” Price, the chairman of the Republican Study Committee, told CNSNews.com. “The leadership in the Senate and Speaker (Nancy) Pelosi have clearly been aggressive in encouraging and demanding that their members do things that don’t necessarily represent their constituencies.”

    Price also has launched an online petition asking House Speaker Pelosi not to call a lame duck session, even though he admits it’s a losing battle:

    “We’ll have a lame duck session because they haven’t been responsible and completed the work that most Congresses do by this point,” Price said. “We haven’t had a single appropriations bill go through the entire process. They continue to not have a budget. They have not dealt with the issue of tax increases.”

    “We’ll have to have a lame duck session,” Price repeated. “The question is, whether or not it will deal with huge issues that are very controversial with the American people or whether or not they are going to do those things before the election so the American people can make a decision based upon those votes.”

    VIDEO: http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/checker.aspx?v=hdnznzqGaG

    http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/70735
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,322
    Great little video. I love how he spells out all the 'claims' of the democrats and weighs them against the REALITIES of what they have done. :)
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Resident Grandpa marv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Shell Knob, MO
    Posts
    3,059
    The only way to "kill" a lame duck session is to tie it up in so many procedural matters that nothing can get done.

    http://members.socket.net/~mcruzan/images/allen-west.jpg

    Four boxes keep us free: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.

    THIS POST WILL BE MONITORED BY THE NSA
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •