Thread: The third investigation of Michael Mann goes down in flames...

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23
  1. #21  
    Senior Member The Night Owl's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,586
    Quote Originally Posted by Constitutionally Speaking View Post
    ONCE, as long as it is by a competent impartial committee. In other words, NOT by members of the Anthropogenic Global Warming Cult.
    How do you know that the judge who threw Ken Cuccinelli's ass to the curb isn't impartial? And, if you're so big on impartiality then why aren't you barking about Cuccinelli, a professed climate change denier, investigating Michael Mann?
    Ubi Dubium Ibi Libertas
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #22  
    Super Moderator Constitutionally Speaking's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    4,301
    Quote Originally Posted by The Night Owl View Post
    How do you know that the judge who threw Ken Cuccinelli's ass to the curb isn't impartial? And, if you're so big on impartiality then why aren't you barking about Cuccinelli, a professed climate change denier, investigating Michael Mann?

    We have had a cover up and we need an investigation. An investigator SHOULD be a skeptic, not an acolyte.

    This is not a trial. If the investigation turns up something THEN it is a time for impartiality in the trial.
    I long for the days when our President actually liked our country.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #23  
    Resident Grump
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    7,767
    AGW is a myth a lie, a scam, a hoax perpetrated by a bunch of "scientists" thumping a doomsaying bandwagon.

    I can remember a dozen doomsday prophecies over the last fifty years...guess what...we're still here

    Anyone remember the Saturn Conjunction? The "scientific fact" that said that a planetary alignment mean massive quakes and widespread deaths in the millions?

    I do. That was what..thirty years ago?

    Not buying it, then, now or ever. These "models" go a hundred years into the future...paging HG Wells.... and as I seem to recall, one "noted scientist" (Flannery) said and I quote "It could be thousands of years".

    I dont listen to panic mongers, nor do I place any credence in those whom I know have already lied. Once a liar, ALWAYS a liar.Thatisall.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •