Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1 Analysis: Tea Party Signs About Policy And Not Race 
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    16,669
    Few signs at tea party rally expressed racially charged anti-Obama themes

    By Amy Gardner
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Wednesday, October 13, 2010; 1:00 PM
    A new analysis of political signs displayed at a tea party rally in Washington last month reveals that the vast majority of activists expressed narrow concerns about the government's economic and spending policies and steered clear of the racially charged anti-Obama messages that have helped define some media coverage of such events.
    Emily Ekins, a graduate student at UCLA, conducted the survey at the 9/12 Taxpayer March on Washington last month by scouring the crowd, row by row and hour by hour, and taking a picture of every sign she passed.

    Ekins photographed about 250 signs, and more than half of those she saw reflected a "limited government ethos," she found - touching on such topics as the role of government, liberty, taxes, spending, deficit and concern about socialism. Examples ranged from the simple message "$top the $pending" scrawled in black-marker block letters to more elaborate drawings of bar charts, stop signs and one poster with the slogan "Socialism is Legal Theft" and a stick-figure socialist pointing a gun at the head of a taxpayer.

    There were uglier messages, too - including "Obama Bin Lyin' - Impeach Now" and "Somewhere in Kenya a Village is Missing its Idiot."(what the article doesn't say is that both of these slogans were on the same sign. Just look at the photos and you'll see) But Ekins's analysis showed that only about a quarter of all signs reflected direct anger with Obama. Only 5 percent of the total mentioned the president's race or religion, and slightly more than 1 percent questioned his American citizenship.

    Ekins's conclusion is not that the racially charged messages are unimportant but that media coverage of tea party rallies over the past year have focused so heavily on the more controversial signs that it has contributed to the perception that such content dominates the tea party movement more than it actually does.

    "Really this is an issue of salience," Ekins said. "Just because a couple of percentage points of signs have those messages doesn't mean the other people don't share those views, but it doesn't mean they do, either. But when 25 percent of the coverage is devoted to those signs, it suggests that this is the issue that 25 percent of people think is so important that they're going to put it on a sign, when it's actually only a couple of people."

    Ekins spent the summer researching the tea party movement and also as an intern at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank in Washington. The survey was for her UCLA graduate studies.

    The march attracted thousands of protesters to the Mall on Sept. 12, a repeat of an event one year earlier that became an emblem of the growing anger among conservative voters with the Obama Administration and such big-ticket initiatives as the stimulus package and the push to overhaul the health-care system. This year's event did not attract nearly as large a crowd as 2009, in part because it came just two weeks after Glenn Beck's successful "Restoring Honor" rally at the Lincoln Memorial, which attracted some participants with similar concerns.

    But the 9/12 event, which was produced by national tea party organizer FreedomWorks, was a more overtly political event than Beck's. Organizers encouraged marchers to bring signs and express their dismay with government spending - and their intent to vote accordingly on Nov. 2.

    Adam Brandon, a spokesman for FreedomWorks, said his organization did not instruct protesters to limit their messages to fiscal slogans, but he did patrol the crowd and threw out a few protesters carrying signs depicting Obama as Adolf Hitler.

    Linky
    As you can see, this is in the WaPo. Not exactly a conservative newspaper. Of course the left is going to dismiss this as the person conducting the study is a shill for the Libertarian movement but facts are facts.
    Last edited by NJCardFan; 10-14-2010 at 10:21 AM.
    The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member Arroyo_Doble's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Ft Worth
    Posts
    3,788
    Adam Brandon, a spokesman for FreedomWorks, said his organization did not instruct protesters to limit their messages to fiscal slogans, but he did patrol the crowd and threw out a few protesters carrying signs depicting Obama as Adolf Hitler.
    Not very libertarian of him.

    And how do you throw someone out of the National Mall?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    16,669
    Quote Originally Posted by Arroyo_Doble View Post
    Adam Brandon, a spokesman for FreedomWorks, said his organization did not instruct protesters to limit their messages to fiscal slogans, but he did patrol the crowd and threw out a few protesters carrying signs depicting Obama as Adolf Hitler.
    Not very libertarian of him.

    And how do you throw someone out of the National Mall?
    Where does it say he is a libertarian?
    The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member Arroyo_Doble's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Ft Worth
    Posts
    3,788
    Quote Originally Posted by NJCardFan View Post
    Where does it say he is a libertarian?
    Good point. He may be a Marxist. Does he have a beard?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    16,669
    Quote Originally Posted by Arroyo_Doble View Post
    Good point. He may be a Marxist. Does he have a beard?
    What makes him a Marxist? Didn't he do what you people told him to do and that's get rid of the racists out of the movement? He makes an attempt at doing so and now you question it? Hypocritical much are you?
    The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member Arroyo_Doble's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Ft Worth
    Posts
    3,788
    Quote Originally Posted by NJCardFan View Post
    What makes him a Marxist?
    Nothing. It was a joke. I do not know his political leanings and can only make a guess. Chances are, he is a generic douche who doesn't want to pay for the benefits of government he receives or maybe just another Ruling Class lackey who wants to fuck over working people now that the Social Security bill has come due.

    Didn't he do what you people told him to do and that's get rid of the racists out of the movement?
    I didn't tell him to do a damned thing. Stop confusing me with the fantasies in your head.

    He makes an attempt at doing so and now you question it?
    Glibness is not "question[ing]" him. My only question (half serious) was how you toss someone out of the National Mall. As far as him policing the kooks in his so called movement, that is just playing the image game like every other mainstream, and well funded, political hackery.

    Hypocritical much are you?
    Often hypocritcal I am stop I try, Yoda.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •