Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1 Dems back third-party candidates to undercut GOP 
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    (10-23) 04:00 PDT Orlando --

    Seeking any slight advantage in their effort to avoid losing control of Congress, Democrats are working behind the scenes in a number of tight races to bolster longshot third-party candidates who have platforms at odds with the Democratic agenda but hold the promise of siphoning Republican votes.

    The efforts are taking place with varying degrees of stealth. And in many cases, they seem to hold as much risk as potential reward for Democrats, prompting accusations of hypocrisy and dirty tricks from Republicans and the third-party movements that are on the receiving end of the unlikely, and sometimes unwelcome, support.

    In Southern California, Republicans have received recorded phone calls from a self-proclaimed but unidentified "registered Republican" who says she is voting for the American Independent Party's candidate for a House seat, Bill Lussenheide, not for the incumbent Republican, Mary Bono Mack. The caller says she is voting that way because "it's time we show Washington what a true conservative looks like."

    The recording was openly paid for by the Democratic candidate for the seat, Mayor Steve Pougnet of Palm Springs.

    In Pennsylvania, the Democratic candidate for a suburban Philadelphia House seat, Bryan Lentz, admitted this week that his volunteers helped Jim Schneller - a prominent skeptic of President Obama's citizenship - collect petitions to run against Lentz and his Republican opponent, Pat Meehan.

    In Nevada, conservative radio listeners have heard an advertisement promoting the Senate campaign of a "Tea Party of Nevada" candidate, Scott Ashjian. The ads also criticize Sharron Angle, the Republican nominee and favored candidate of the actual Tea Party movement in the race for the seat of Sen. Harry Reid, the Democratic majority leader.

    The ad was sponsored by a group backed by unions and casino and mining companies supporting Reid.

    Nevada is one of several states, including Florida, where "Tea Party" political committees have appeared on ballot lines without the knowledge or support of leading Tea Party activists. And in most of those cases, local bloggers, reporters and lawyers have traced connections back to local Democrats, drawing a number of lawsuits, complaints and, in a couple of cases, admissions of involvement.

    "It is one of the dirtiest moves," said Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Bakersfield (Kern County), a vice chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee. "In congressional races, it could steer the tide for the majority."

    In response to questions about whether the efforts were being coordinated on a national level, the Democratic National Committee said in a statement, "Republicans have no one to blame but their own ideological intolerance for the bloody civil war on their side."

    Stealth support for third-party candidates who have the potential to cut into the other side's votes is a time-tested political tradition for both parties. But this year's efforts are striking for the potency of the grassroots movement that Democrats are trying to use to their advantage - that is, the Tea Party - and for the sometimes brazen nature of the attempts.

    In Florida, local Republicans and grassroots Tea Party activists continue to press the case that "Tea Party" candidates on the ballot are stalking horses for Democrats - an assertion that Democrats deny.

    Tea Party activists in the state said they were flabbergasted to learn of the existence of a "Tea Party" ballot line.

    "I didn't know who the heck these people were," said Everett Wilkinson, a grassroots activist.

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...MNNM1G0V4Q.DTL
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
     

  2. #2  
    There's talk out here that the Dems are funding Maes. They must be since he's at 9% right now so it's not like the Pubbies are backing him.

    Tancredo (Constitution Party) is now in a dead heat with the Looper. :D
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Pierce County
    Posts
    2,081
    Third parties are always losers for the republicans. Tancrazy winning in Colorado will be a setback to conservatives nationwide.
     

  4. #4  
    PORCUS MAXIMUS Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    42,083
    Quote Originally Posted by Mau10man View Post
    Third parties are always losers for the republicans. Tancrazy winning in Colorado will be a setback to conservatives nationwide.
    Shad ap!:D
     

  5. #5  
    Quote Originally Posted by Mau10man View Post
    Third parties are always losers for the republicans. Tancrazy winning in Colorado will be a setback to conservatives nationwide.
    No, if Tancredo wins, it will prove that conservative principles are a winning formula regardless of machine politics and the glad-handing, good old boyz network.

    Even if he doesn't win, it will shake the Colorado GOP out of the stupor they've been in for 15 years. It's a win/win no matter what happens.
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Woodland Park, Colorado, United States
    Posts
    8,563
    Quote Originally Posted by Gingersnap View Post
    No, if Tancredo wins, it will prove that conservative principles are a winning formula regardless of machine politics and the glad-handing, good old boyz network.

    Even if he doesn't win, it will shake the Colorado GOP out of the stupor they've been in for 15 years. It's a win/win no matter what happens.
    I agree. I was upset that Tancredo entered the race but now I want Maes to do the right thing and back out. Maes can only ensure a Hickenstupor election. Colorado and the nation cannot stand more liberal idiocy. Tancredo is the only one who can beat this liberal moron (Hickenstupor) and needs to win. Maes cannot hope to win and is staying in because he is pissed off at Tancredo.
    Education without values, as useful as it is, seems rather to make man a more clever devil.
    C. S. Lewis
    Do not ever say that the desire to "do good" by force is a good motive. Neither power-lust nor stupidity are good motives. (Are you listening Barry)?:mad:
    Ayn Rand
     

  7. #7  
    Quote Originally Posted by AmPat View Post
    I agree. I was upset that Tancredo entered the race but now I want Maes to do the right thing and back out. Maes can only ensure a Hickenstupor election. Colorado and the nation cannot stand more liberal idiocy. Tancredo is the only one who can beat this liberal moron (Hickenstupor) and needs to win. Maes cannot hope to win and is staying in because he is pissed off at Tancredo.
    I think he's got dog-in-the-manger syndrome. I don't know if Tancredo can win but I literally don't know one Republican who will vote for him and I know a lot of Pubbies.
     

  8. #8  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Mau10man View Post
    Third parties are always losers for the republicans. Tancrazy winning in Colorado will be a setback to conservatives nationwide.
    Dude - what do you have against Tancrado?
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •