10-26-2010, 09:23 PM
I don't think we were SOLD anything faulty on purpose. If Saddam was on the up and up - and I do NOT think he was, then what Bush did was the result of faulty intelligence.
That intelligence was faulty because of the literal castration of our intelligence services by starving it of funds (nearly ALL human intelligence was let go by the Clinton administration) and by neutering it with rules that made it impossible to recruit decent new human intelligence.
I also don't think that 1000 tonnes of VX gas is equivalent to crumbs.I long for the days when our President actually liked our country.
10-26-2010, 09:24 PMStand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
10-27-2010, 05:44 PM
Why is it that Bush spent the last 4 years of his presidency trying to fight damage control for not finding any WMD's and still to this day accepts that we found nothing of any relevance?
So...How did information like this go completely unnoticed in his daily briefings? How is this not a gotcha moment years ago when it was discovered to shove right in the face of the liberals who denouced the war?
If "this" was the WMD "stockpiles" we were truly "looking for" then why is it still classified? Powell's initial briefing on Weapons had site pictures and everything...so it wasn't because it was too secret to release that we found something.
I guess CS, this justification for invasion, occupation and nationbuilding and 4000 American soldier deaths just hits a nerve with me. Because for so long we've been bogged down trying to nationbuild this podunk M.E. nation. Thankfully, I think some conservatives are beginning to realize that you can’t have limited government and a policy of endless occupations. Just like government can't solve problems here at home, it sure as hell can't fix the backward M.E. region.Gun Control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound - Unknown
The problem is Empty People, Not Loaded Guns - Linda Schrock Taylor
10-27-2010, 11:29 PMThe nerve agent VX stockpiled at the Newport Chemical Depot in Indiana is stored in 1,690 steel ton containers commonly known as "TCs". These containers are designed specifically for the maintenance, storage, and transportation of bulk chemical agent. The Newport Chemical Depot (NECD) stores bulk nerve agent VX in ton containers that are over six and one-half feet long, and almost three feet in diameter. The solid steel sidewalls are roughly a half inch thick, and each end is about one inch thick. When empty, the containers weigh 1,600 pounds. When filled to capacity, the containers can hold up to 170 gallons of liquid, though the TCs stored at Newport have a layer of nitrogen gas that occupies a 10 percent void within the TC. Ton containers are designed to withstand pressures up to 25 times greater than the pressure of our atmosphere, and internal pressures up to 500 pounds per square inch. The ton containers at Newport are stacked in rows three containers high, and are clamped together for stability on top of wooden concave cradles inside a single warehouse of corrugated steel sheet metal supported by steel beams. In order to provide maximum protection to facility personnel and the environment, storage personnel are trained in handling ton containers storing chemical agent and monitoring the containers for signs of leakage
- Join Date
- May 2008
Each container holds 400 lbs of VX/container * 1690 containers = 676,000 lbs VX/2200lb per tonne = 307 tonnes VX
307 tonne = 307,000,000,000 mg
For a 70kg man, the lethal inhalational dose is 30mg (VX MSDS)
307 tonne VX = 10,233,333,333 lethal doses
So 1000 tonnes, over 30 billion lethal doses, of VX is over 3 times what a US Chemical Weapons Depot was designed to hold. Crumbs???
Last edited by Nubs; 10-27-2010 at 11:55 PM.
10-28-2010, 08:04 AM
Unfortunately it was weaponized. I am not claiming that we found all that we are looking for. In fact the point of Blix's statement here was that we HAVE NOT found it. But THAT is the problem. Saddam was supposed to show us how he disposed of it, and instead he first tried to confiscate the proof that it existed and then tried to claim he destroyed it (there is absolutely no evidence that it was destroyed). The question still remains - WHERE IS IT? (SYRIA??)
From the earlier link to Hans Blix's United Nations address:
UNMOVIC, however, has information that conflicts with this account. There are indications that Iraq had worked on the problem of purity and stabilization and that more had been achieved than has been declared. Indeed, even one of the documents provided by Iraq indicates that the purity of the agent, at least in laboratory production, was higher than declared.
There are also indications that the agent was weaponised.
Last edited by Constitutionally Speaking; 10-28-2010 at 08:07 AM.I long for the days when our President actually liked our country.
10-28-2010, 08:59 AM
The author included a blurb about the idea of preemptive action (namely about Iraq). It said that the big-whigs at the top were all in agreement that while Iraq posed no immediate threat (within a year or two), with the evolving war on terrorism, there was little doubt that Saddam's regime was going to be a major supplier of money, arms, and training, and with the questionable intelligence about his WMD capablities...
We already had plenty of proof that he was doing that, and the longer there was no action being taken, the more emboldened he was going to be in doing it. Eventually, another 9/11 would have occured, and Saddam very likely would have had his fingerprints on it.
We weren't talking about a convential threat in the idea of preemptive action. We were talking about a major power aiding an uncoventional attacker against us. That was the basis for the preemptive action, and I fully agree with it.
Last edited by djones520; 10-28-2010 at 09:22 AM.In most sports, cold-cocking an opposing player repeatedly in the face with a series of gigantic Slovakian uppercuts would get you a multi-game suspension without pay.
In hockey, it means you have to sit in the penalty box for five minutes.
10-28-2010, 02:58 PM
- Join Date
- May 2010
If you wanted to attack radical Islam, and I'm not sure that's even remotely possibly via wars, Iraq was not the hotbed its been made out to be. Saddam kept that shit in check, perhaps maniacally, but if you subscribe to a American-centric world view keeping him in power was not such a bad idea.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|