Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1 It's not 1994 again 
    It's not 1994 again


    U.S. President Barack Obama holds a news conference, the day after Republicans gained 60 seats in the House of Representatives in midterm elections, in the East Room of the White House November 3, 2010 in Washington, DC. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

    Democrats are apt to prettify recollections of the aftermath of the Republican takeover of the House in 1994. But Obama isn't showing signs of being Clinton, and Boehner's no self-destructing Gingrich.

    By Doyle McManus

    November 4, 2010

    It's common these days and, to some Democrats, comforting to summon hazy memories of 1994, when, as happened again on Tuesday, their party lost the House of Representatives to the Republicans. That wasn't so bad, was it? After all, it led to a period of productive bipartisan deal-making and then, two years later, Bill Clinton won reelection by a comfortable margin.

    But that is a prettied-up version of history. Before President Clinton and then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich were able to compromise on taxes, spending cuts and welfare reform, they collided spectacularly in a bitter budget confrontation that led to two federal government shutdowns in 1995. Just as Gingrich and his Republicans had to test the limits of their newly won power, so too will the new majority of Speaker-to-be John A. Boehner look for at least one tough confrontation with Obama, both to test the president's resilience and to keep promises to their "tea party" constituents. One almost certain clash: a vote to repeal Obama's healthcare law, even though Obama is virtually certain to veto it.

    And Obama's challenge over the next two years looks more difficult than Clinton's, in several ways.

    Get the best in Southern California opinion journalism delivered to your inbox with our Opinion L.A. newsletter. Sign up

    Partly, this is because Barack Obama is no Bill Clinton. When the Democrats lost in 1994, Clinton's reaction the next day was: "They sent us a clear message. I got it."

    You didn't hear words like that from Obama on Wednesday. He blamed his party's reverses on the slow pace of economic recovery, on the "ugly mess" of deal-making in Congress and on the White House bubble that makes him look isolated. The only specific failing the president acknowledged on his part was his failure to keep the business community on his side. Where Clinton accepted grudgingly that his party had overreached and needed to move toward the center, Obama insisted that everything his administration had done was right, even if some of it was misunderstood.

    That's a defensible argument, but it sounds out of touch the day after so many voters abandoned his party. And it reflects an important difference between Obama and Clinton: Clinton is a centrist from Arkansas who spent much of his career striking deals with conservatives. Obama is a liberal from Chicago who has succeeded, so far, mostly by appealing to his party's base.
    More at the link.

    LA Times
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Best Bounty Hunter in the Forums fettpett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Southwest Michigan (in Exile)
    Posts
    8,757
    nope, 1994 wasn't expected, this was (hell some are seeing as a disappointment because the Senate wasn't taken back either). These GOP'ers aren't there thinking they are going to Govern, but are there at the People behest to write the laws and tighten the purse strings. And Obama isn't Clinton and doesn't have his pragmatism to shift to the "center", Obama is a idealist and political hack.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    PORCUS MAXIMUS Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    41,850
    I expect him to ramp up, cap and trade through the back door (EPA) and an out of control justice department.
    Prepare for a fight.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    11,970
    In 2 years 10 Senate Democats from red states will run for re-election. I see a bunch of them jumping ship and voting to extend all tax cuts, inflict serious damage on the health care and cap and trade bill as it stands. They want to keep their jobs. The make up of the Senate may be a better outcome cause Obama could not claim that the Repubs were totally at fault in 012. Obummer will not budge on 99% of his policies.
    Last edited by lacarnut; 11-04-2010 at 11:09 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •