Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23
  1. #21  
    Senior Member Constitutionally Speaking's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    4,301
    It is fairly well known here that my sister is gay. I love her and her partner, but that being said, I still believe that homosexual acts are wrong. It is not my business to interfere in their private lives BUT, when gays petition for special rights or for influencing the curriculum in our schools, it suddenly becomes my business.
    When gay groups petition for silencing anyone who dares disagree with them, then it should concern EVERYONE.
    I long for the days when our President actually liked our country.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #22  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Florida. The Cuban Part.
    Posts
    3,007
    Quote Originally Posted by m00 View Post
    The same as anyone: their opinion. This reeks of thought police to me.
    Yep. Not in MY name. GLAAD can go sit down somewhere on this one.

    ~QC
    "The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. To be your own man is hard business. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself." Rudyard Kipling - (1865-1936)

    Context doesn't matter to this liberal it seems/ as long as it satisfies his godless dreams/ like monkeys throwing sh!t as castles in air/ as long as he throws/that is the extent of his care.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #23  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,421
    Quote Originally Posted by m00 View Post
    If the privately owned news organization wants him to be. Last I checked it wasn't illegal to have an opinion, and it wasn't illegal for a news organization to invite whomever they choose to give their opinions.
    The question wasn't "can" it was "should".

    I disagree with the lawsuit, and I disagree with some of the labeling of "hate groups" based on their mere opinions regarding same sex marriage. But I do believe that all "news" outlets ought to be more discerning when it comes to their determination as to who is relevant to speak..on many things, not just same sex issues.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •