Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 81 to 89 of 89
  1. #81  
    The big Cheese
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    3,323
    Quote Originally Posted by Rebel Yell View Post
    bwahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!
    One does not greet death when he knocks at your door.

    Nay you repeatedly punch him in the throat as he slowly drags you away.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #82 wikipedia 
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    14
    "wikipedia's climate change doctors: which spoke of a group of radical climate change believers who in an attempt to remove the “Medieval Warm Period” from existence and to instead jam the hockey stick up our ass, coordinated efforts to alter Wikipedia’s climate change pages. One person in ths nine-member Realclimate.org team — U.K. scientist and Green Party activist, William Connolley, created or rewrote 5,428 unique Wikipedia articles.

    Since he and his cohorts were exposed by Lawrence Soloman in the Financial Post, fair and balanced Wikipedia members have been trying to correct the pages. But, Connolley and his brethren are back. And so are their distortions. Soloman said in his December 23 followup that in the three days following his expose, the Wikipedia page for the Medieval Warm Period, as an example, was changed 50 times in battles between Connolley’s crew and others.

    The “rediscovery” of the Medieval Warm Period (through data and the doubting global warming scientists themselves, as revealed in the now famous climategate emails) has since widely discredited hockey stick graph, the supreme icon of the global warming religion. As you can imagine, the fight over this graph is the of the hottest battles. And the propagandists at Wikipedia have triumphed–the graph appears at the top of the page for the Medieval Warm Period, as if “the science is settled” still.

    Battles over this and many other pages ensued, until finally the Medieval Warm period page, along with many others, were froze from future edits. The hockey stick is intact, as is much other invalid information
    blah blah blah....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #83  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by wilbur View Post
    Knowing that its the warmest year on record doesnt really demonstrate anything... except that it was the warmest year on record.

    I take that back - it does shed some warmth on the new annual winter tradition of AGW skeptic crowd, where ritual victory dances are performed and celebrations are had during cold snaps (or even just when it snows really hard), to gloat over their enemies, in surety that their beloved deity has smote Al Gore and his heretic church, once and for all.

    Think of last winter... then observe the global temperature... think of last winter... then observe the global temperature... think... observe.... hopefully things are starting to click.
    not sure of your point....it hasn't been statistically warmer for 12-15 years. in the last 110 years it has only increased by .7 degrees and probably that .7 was erased in the last 12.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #84 realclimate 
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by The Night Owl View Post
    realclimate is the real problem. its like asking the wolf what happened to the chickens. when he says nothing you say 'o.k.'
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #85  
    Senior Member Molon Labe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Jihad Me At Hello
    Posts
    4,976
    It's an agenda

    the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud
    It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist.

    Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford's book organizes the facts very well.) I don't believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.

    So what has the APS, as an organization, done in the face of this challenge? It has accepted the corruption as the norm, and gone along with it. - Professor Harold Lewis
    http://www.thegwpf.org/press-release...-the-gwpf.html
    Gun Control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound - Unknown


    The problem is Empty People, Not Loaded Guns - Linda Schrock Taylor
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #86  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,838
    TNO - why do you believe in Global Warming?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #87  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,322
    Remember 10 years ago when the alarmists told us that we're going to lose our winters?

    2002:
    "Global warming threatens future Winter Olympic Games because it is resulting in less snow, and shorter and warmer winters," said Jonathan Lash, WRI president, during a press conference held at Salt Lake City today. "Just as Salt Lake has done, we urge potential host cities to seriously consider the consequences of global warming in planning future Winter Olympic Games."
    http://archive.wri.org/news.cfm?id=22
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #88  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    21,235
    It's 11 degrees right now(up from 10 degrees an hour ago). Global warming is a real bitch.
    Progressivism is a bottomless pit of absurdity.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #89  
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bavaria
    Posts
    9,152


    This graph shows the average of 18 non-tree ring proxies of temperature from 12 locations around the Northern Hemisphere, published by Craig Loehle in 2007, and later revised in 2008. It clearly shows that natural climate variability happens, and these proxies coincide with known events in human history.

    Loehle also published in 2008 a paper that described why tree rings can not be trusted as a proxy for past temperature variations. Tree ring data have what is called a “divergence problem” in the late 20th Century where the tree ring data data suggests cooling, when in fact there has been warming. This, by itself, should cast serious doubt on whether tree ring reconstructions (such as Michael Mann’s famous “hockey stick” curve) can be used to estimate past global temperature variability.

    http://www.drroyspencer.com/global-w...-temperatures/
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •