Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1 Democrats: Emboldening America's Enemies & Terrifying Her Allies Since 1976...... 
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    .Ann Coulter..The Middle East is on fire again, and crazy Muslims with funny names aren't helping things -- Mahmoud, ElBaradei, al-Banna, Barack... The major new development is that NOW liberals want to get rid of a dictator in the Middle East! Where were they when we were taking out the guy with the rape rooms?

    Remember? The one who had gassed his own people, invaded his neighbors and was desperately seeking weapons of mass destruction? The guy who emerged from a spider hole looking like Charlie Sheen after a three-day bender?

    Liberals couldn't have been less interested in removing Saddam Hussein and building a democracy in Iraq. So it's really adorable seeing them get all choked up about democracy now. Say, as long as liberals are all gung-ho about getting rid of out-of-touch, overbearing dictators, how about we start with Janet Napolitano?
    Reply With Quote  

  2. #2  
    Our widdle friend. Wei Wu Wei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    There is as difference between a legitimate people's uprising where the people themselves take the handling of their country into their own hands, and when a foreign imperial force invades a country, ousts their leader, and imposes our own system on them (all while killing hundreds of thousands of civilians who take up arms to resist the foreign invaders).

    If you can't see the difference between the two there isn't much else to say.
    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Smith - Wealth of Nations
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
    Reply With Quote  

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts