Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21
  1. #1 Kinetic Military Action 
    Senior Member ironhorsedriver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Coal Fields of WV
    Posts
    509
    The Obama Administration, as reported by the Washington Examiner, States that we are not getting envolved in another war, Action in Libya are nothing more than a ," Kinetic Military Action". I feel a lot better about it all now, how about you?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Our widdle friend. Wei Wu Wei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,414
    support the troops.

    if you don't support the commander-in-chief you cannot support the troops. if you are critical of the mission you only undermine our men and women in uniform and give the enemy more propaganda to fight us with.

    i learned a whole lot from the bush years
    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Smith - Wealth of Nations
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Ape Articulate_Ape's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    NJ, Exit Only
    Posts
    8,006
    How do you support the mission when you don't know what it is?
    "The efforts of the government alone will never be enough. In the end the people must choose and the people must help themselves" ~ JFK; from his famous inauguration speech (What Democrats sounded like before today's neo-Liberals hijacked that party)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member ironhorsedriver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Coal Fields of WV
    Posts
    509
    I always support the troops, I've been one. I was showing the lunacy of your Messiah, and his wonderful play on words.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member Meshuga Mikey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    San Anselmo CA
    Posts
    372
    PEE CEE must go along with those who foster its use.

    perhaps someone can come up with a PEE CEE term for the bozo in chief
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member Rebel Yell's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    South GA
    Posts
    5,181
    Quote Originally Posted by Wei Wu Wei View Post
    support the troops.

    if you don't support the commander-in-chief you cannot support the troops. if you are critical of the mission you only undermine our men and women in uniform and give the enemy more propaganda to fight us with.

    i learned a whole lot from the bush years
    I hope the troops accomplish the task at hand. i just don't know what that is.
    I feel that once a black fella has referred to white foks as "honky paleface devil white-trash cracker redneck Caspers," he's abdicated the right to get upset about the "N" word. But that's just me. -- Jim Goad
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    PORCUS MAXIMUS Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    42,932
    Quote Originally Posted by Meshuga Mikey View Post
    PEE CEE must go along with those who foster its use.

    perhaps someone can come up with a PEE CEE term for the bozo in chief
    AMEN!!!
    The difference between pigs and people is that when they tell you you're cured it isn't a good thing.
    http://i.imgur.com/FHvkMSE.jpg
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Our widdle friend. Wei Wu Wei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,414
    Quote Originally Posted by Rebel Yell View Post
    I hope the troops accomplish the task at hand. i just don't know what that is.
    yeah we need clear goals such as "defeat terrorism" or "defend freedom!"
    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Smith - Wealth of Nations
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Ape Articulate_Ape's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    NJ, Exit Only
    Posts
    8,006
    Quote Originally Posted by Wei Wu Wei View Post
    yeah we need clear goals such as "defeat terrorism" or "defend freedom!"

    I'd say those are lofty goals. Very difficult to reach, but worthwhile, just like curing cancer or diabetes. What we are talking about is an unknown goal, even to those commanding the action.
    "The efforts of the government alone will never be enough. In the end the people must choose and the people must help themselves" ~ JFK; from his famous inauguration speech (What Democrats sounded like before today's neo-Liberals hijacked that party)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member Rebel Yell's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    South GA
    Posts
    5,181
    Quote Originally Posted by Wei Wu Wei View Post
    yeah we need clear goals such as "defeat terrorism" or "defend freedom!"
    What words would you put with the current goals?

    The problem I'm having with Obama are the same I had with Bush, either shit or get off the pot. There is no reason for us to be involved in a long, drawn out war. Politicians have to turn loose the leash and let the big dog do it's thing. You definately can't tell the enemy how long to hang in there. We'll be leaving in a week.
    I feel that once a black fella has referred to white foks as "honky paleface devil white-trash cracker redneck Caspers," he's abdicated the right to get upset about the "N" word. But that's just me. -- Jim Goad
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •