View Poll Results: Rate President Obama
- 36. You may not vote on this poll
1 - Empty Suit
5 - GOD
Thread: Rate President Obama.
03-29-2011, 06:12 PM
He deserves very negative numbers, and any asshole who voted for him deserves to be deported.
rm -rf obama*
03-29-2011, 06:23 PM
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Southwest Michigan (in Exile)
Let me know when we mobilize to invade and occupy another nation. As far as air strikes, I doubt every president who has engaged in such action has first gotten a vote in Congress (I know for a fact St Reagan didn’t). Also, the vote on the first Gulf War occurred January 12, 1991. How many assets did Bush the Greater move before that date?
- Join Date
- May 2008
03-29-2011, 07:42 PM
hovering between 2 or 3Originally Posted by Adam Smith - Wealth of Nations
03-29-2011, 09:20 PM
Empty suit I say,
but only because there was no negative option in the poll.
03-29-2011, 09:26 PM
Please. If the POTUS has to give a specific order to whack a few pirates on the high seas, then he is a micro-manager. Most micro-managers I have known do so only because they are empty suits.
Obama is just a guy that has a tendency to nod his head to bad ideas and bow to bad people. He is out of his league and being played by people that have known this for years, but just needed a Bieber to counter our Gipper. He has no strong thinker by his side like GW Bush did (DARTH CHENEY!). He has instead a reincarnation of Gleason's equally daft foil: Norton.
Nope. If you are torn about whether he is an empty suit or not, ask yourself this: "Would you hire him to run your company?"
Nuff said."Our president delivered his State of the Union message to Congress. That is one of the things his contract calls for -- to tell congress the condition of the country. This message, as I say, is to Congress. The rest of the people know the condition of the country, for they live in it, but Congress has no idea what is going on in America, so the president has to tell 'em." ~ Will Rogers
03-30-2011, 02:32 AM
To answer the Major's question about National Security and who was worse...I'd have to say Clinton for two reasons.
1. To my knowledge Obama has never ducked calls from the situation room when his approval was needed on an air strike on a known terrorist.
Did I mention the calls that Clinton avoided were in relation to an airstrike that could have taken out bin Laden?
2. President Obama has never...to anyone's knowledge...lost the launch codes for our nuclear arsenal. Codes that by the way...were never found.
Those two incidents right there put Billy Jeff at the top of the worst in handling National Security by a President list bar none.In Memory Of My Friend 1st Sgt. Tim Millsap A Co, 70th Eng. Bn. 3rd Bde 1st AD...K.I.A. 25 April 2005
Liberalism Is The Philosophy Of The Stupid
To Achieve Ordered Liberty You Must Have Moral Order As Well
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.
03-30-2011, 02:36 AM
- Join Date
- May 2010
He's moving to reform things that need to be reformed but when it actually comes down the actual reform itself its just the same garbage ideas aimed at keeping the rich richer and middle class as the rich's pinata. I guess it might be the thought that counts but I'm so used to this crap that I'm fairly convinced he's just the digestable face put on undigestable legislation.
What keeps from being a 2 is he does carry the country as a whole pretty well. Buys us some international cred and peopel elsewhere generally dont mind the guy. If people follow his model of cultural consideration and open-mindedness about the rest of the world it'll probably soften the inevitable collapse of the American Empire.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|