Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 97
  1. #21  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    492
    This "poll" is nothing but an intended distraction from $4 a gallon gas, high food prices, unemployment, new wars, etc.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #22  
    Our widdle friend. Wei Wu Wei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,414
    Quote Originally Posted by CueSi View Post
    I understand VERY well how samples are done. This was a telephone poll, correct? Most polls like this are done via landline, something that is quite on the way out. Think about this... how many people do YOU know have landlines? At least down here, not alot , and not anyone under the age of 60 (hell, even some people over 60 gave up a landline or use it for computer use only). And with over 60's you're gonna have a different set of attitudes and in a state of 2 million, where the majority votes Republican, methinks a Democratically biased polling outfit is gonna take a couple shortcuts.
    All of this typing and you obviously didn't even spend 10 seconds to click the link and look at the first few pages.

    It gives an age breakdown and 68% of the people who participated were under the age of 65.

    Your 10 seconds of thought and criticism were amazingly answered in the first few pages of the study, almost as if you formed your reactionary opinion without even looking at the thing you are bleating about.


    If this poll had any true traction besides DU masturbation fodder, it would be somewhere else besides Salon.com.
    It's at a lot of places, just because the link I posted was from Salon.com doesn't mean it doesn't exist anywhere else.

    let me google that for you:

    http://www.aolnews.com/2011/04/08/46...cial-marriage/

    http://www.google.com/#q=mississippi...09a90cde17f16d
    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Smith - Wealth of Nations
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #23  
    Our widdle friend. Wei Wu Wei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,414
    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Smith - Wealth of Nations
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #24  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    492
    Wow, a picture posted from 50 years ago!

    Point, set, win for the Wee.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #25  
    Our widdle friend. Wei Wu Wei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,414
    Quote Originally Posted by nightflight View Post
    Wow, a picture posted from 50 years ago!

    Point, set, win for the Wee.
    those people had children you know
    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Smith - Wealth of Nations
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #26  
    Senior Member Constitutionally Speaking's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    4,301
    Quote Originally Posted by Wei Wu Wei View Post
    those people had children you know
    And yet 20 out of 21 of the Democrat Senators who opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act STAYED with the Democrat party.
    I long for the days when our President actually liked our country.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #27  
    Senior Member Rebel Yell's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    South GA
    Posts
    5,181
    Quote Originally Posted by Wei Wu Wei View Post
    DAMN!!!!! Look at all those Democrats.
    I feel that once a black fella has referred to white foks as "honky paleface devil white-trash cracker redneck Caspers," he's abdicated the right to get upset about the "N" word. But that's just me. -- Jim Goad
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #28  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Florida. The Cuban Part.
    Posts
    3,007
    Quote Originally Posted by Wei Wu Wei View Post
    All of this typing and you obviously didn't even spend 10 seconds to click the link and look at the first few pages.
    It gives an age breakdown and 68% of the people who participated were under the age of 65.
    Your 10 seconds of thought and criticism were amazingly answered in the first few pages of the study, almost as if you formed your reactionary opinion without even looking at the thing you are bleating about.
    It's at a lot of places, just because the link I posted was from Salon.com doesn't mean it doesn't exist anywhere else.
    let me google that for you:
    http://www.aolnews.com/2011/04/08/46...cial-marriage/
    http://www.google.com/#q=mississippi...09a90cde17f16d

    I did look at the link... but the point remains that the age perameter you're attaching under 65 to is 46-65. Not a huge difference here. We're not talking super young people here or even the average, given that the states average age is about 10 years younger than that.

    MS Demography - - I got links too, Jackass.

    This is still a poor sample not just in regard to size of sample to the size of population of the state. They asked 400 people at random and let your stereotypes fill out the rest - - race of the respondents is missing, remember, racism goes both ways. How about you go find that and shove your own stereotypes and reactionary thinking up your ass... Because AOL/HuffingtonPost, Daily India, and Hip Hop Wired are such influentual news sources. :p

    ~QC
    Last edited by CueSi; 04-12-2011 at 12:28 PM.
    "The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. To be your own man is hard business. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself." Rudyard Kipling - (1865-1936)

    Context doesn't matter to this liberal it seems/ as long as it satisfies his godless dreams/ like monkeys throwing sh!t as castles in air/ as long as he throws/that is the extent of his care.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #29  
    Our widdle friend. Wei Wu Wei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,414
    Quote Originally Posted by Constitutionally Speaking View Post
    And yet 20 out of 21 of the Democrat Senators who opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act STAYED with the Democrat party.
    yeah and they were terrible
    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Smith - Wealth of Nations
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #30  
    Senior Member Zathras's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    San Jose, California
    Posts
    6,498
    yawn, Wee Wee posts a poll from a biased source.....nothing new to see here people...move along...move along.
    Solve a man's problem with violence and help him for a day. Teach a man how to solve his problems with violence, help him for a lifetime - Belkar Bitterleaf
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •