#1 Ohio Case Roe v. Planned Parenthood is Resolved -- What is There to Hide?04-27-2011, 04:18 PM
More illegal Planned Parenthood actions in covering up pedophilia
Resolution of the case comes just months after a major blow to Planned Parenthood's (PP) defense on the applicability of Ohio's informed consent statute. Judge Jody Luebbers ruled that the doctor for PP of Southwest Ohio breached her legal duty by not having an "informed consent" meeting with Jane Roe 24 hours in advance of her abortion, and by failing to obtain written informed consent from Jane and at least one of her parents since Jane was a minor at the time.
In addition to the lack of informed consent, the plaintiffs sought compensatory and punitive damages against PP for failure to comply with their statutory duty to inform Jane Roe's parents of her intended abortion. Jane, at age 14, had been impregnated by her 21-year-old soccer coach, also the man who brought her in for the abortion. Instead of notifying Jane's parents, as required by Ohio law, PP phoned the sexual predator. PP's failure to notify Roe's parents and to gain informed consent resulted in Jane not only undergoing the abortion, but also in the continued cover-up of the sexual abuse, demonstrating a disturbing trend in PP clinics: disregard for the health and wellbeing of women and children.
"Resolution of this case must have been an act of desperation on the part of PP," states Dana Cody, LLDF's President and Executive Director. "They went, in a matter of months, from litigating every inch of their defense to a sudden willingness to resolve the matter. I would speculate that had PP gone to trial there would have been too much exposure of how they do business. After all, they are currently experiencing public outrage over their apparent willingness to cover up the sexual exploitation of children. What more might they have to hide?"“Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet.”
James "Mad Dog" Mattis
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|