Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1 CIA director admits that waterboarding led to bin Laden 
    Senior Member malloc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Queen Creek, AZ
    Posts
    2,147
    Torturous evasions

    CIA Director Leon Panetta stomped on the White House’s political script when he told Tuesday night’s broadcast of NBC Nightly News that the waterboarding of jihadi detainees contributed information that led to the location and killing of Osama bin Laden.

    “We had multiple series of sources that provided information with regards to this situation… clearly some of it came from detainees [and] they used these enhanced interrogation techniques against some of those detainees,” he told NBC anchor Brian Williams.

    When asked by Williams if water-boarding was part of the “enhanced interrogation techniques,” Panetta simply said “that’s correct.”

    Throughout the day, White House officials had pushed back at claims that water-boarding or other enhanced interrogation techniques produced the information that eventually led to Osama bin Laden.

    “The fact is that no single piece of information led to the successful mission,” White House spokesman Carney told reporters at Tuesday’s White House press conference. He also said that administration officials are not reconsidering the administration’s opposition to tougher interrogation practices. There is “no change whatsoever,” he said.

    Several former Bush administration officials previously told TheDC that there’s persuasive evidence that the intelligence surrounding bin Laden’s location stemmed from enhanced interrogation of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed or other terror suspects at CIA black sites around the world.

    Data from tough interrogations has been integrated with information that emerged from softer interrogations at Guantanamo Bay.

    But several Democratic-affiliated constituencies are fiercely opposed to enhanced interrogations. They include much of the legal bar, progressive groups such as the Center for Constitutional Rights, and anti-war groups. Obama courted all three groups during the 2008 election.

    Attorney General Eric Holder followed Carney’s script at a House Judiciary Committee hearing Tuesday morning. There “was a mosaic of sources that led to the identification of people who led” authorities to bin Laden, he said, when asked about the role of tough interrogation. When Rep. Dan Lungren, California Republican, asked Holder if any pieces of that mosaic of sources were a result of enhanced interrogation techniques, Holder evaded the question, saying he wasn’t sure.

    “Multiple detainees provided insights,” Carney told reporters Tuesday afternoon. “Reporting from detainees is a slice of the information that has been gathered by incredibly diligent specialists over the years in the intelligence community, and it simply strains credulity to suggest that a piece of information that may nor may not have been gathered eight years ago somehow directly led to the successful mission on Sunday,” he said.

    “That’s just not the case.”

    Carney did not explicitly reject the claim that tough interrogations provided the first clue – reportedly, the nickname of bin Laden’s personal courier – that seems to have indirectly and eventually led to bin Laden’s hideout.

    During the House hearing, Lungren asked Holder if the mission against bin Laden would have been illegal, if any of the intelligence regarding his whereabouts came from enhanced interrogation. Holder evaded the legal question by using a tortured response, saying “I think that, in terms of the attenuation between those acts that might have been problematic and the action that was taken just two days ago I think was sufficiently long so that the action would still be considered legal.”

    In his NBC interview where he said water-boarding was used in the interrogations that provided the data, Panetta did leave his colleagues in the administration a political fig-leaf. “Whether we would have gotten the same information through other approaches,” he said, “I think is always going to be an open question."

    Story
    Moonbats are going to need to revise their talking points.
    "In England a king hath little more to do than to make war and give away places; which in plain terms, is to impoverish the nation and set it together by the ears. A pretty business indeed for a man to be allowed eight hundred thousand sterling a year for, and worshipped into the bargain! Of more worth is one honest man to society and in the sight of God, than all the crowned ruffians that ever lived."
    —Thomas Paine, Common Sense
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Moderator txradioguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bavaria
    Posts
    7,629
    Quote Originally Posted by malloc View Post
    Moonbats are going to need to revise their talking points.
    Even worse....our little Obama fanboy A_D is gonna have to revise HIS! :eek:
    In Memory Of My Friend 1st Sgt. Tim Millsap A Co, 70th Eng. Bn. 3rd Bde 1st AD...K.I.A. 25 April 2005

    Liberalism Is The Philosophy Of The Stupid

    To Achieve Ordered Liberty You Must Have Moral Order As Well

    The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,126
    I hear heads as'ploding from DU from here :D
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    15,876
    They'll spin it. Apparently the waterboarding happened while Bush was still in office so they'll spin it that the waterboarding didn't get anything concrete and that Obama offering unicorns and rainbows(can't say puppies because puppies are offensive to muslims) is what led to the more pertinent information.
    The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    812
    Waterboarding is not what led us to OBL. It was hard work and dedication in the intelligence community that remained constant over a grueling 9 years that pulled this off. You cant just dunk somebodies' head and magically find OBL, it takes using whatever information you get out of them and making the most of it by following every single lead that nets you a key piece of information that makes this happen.

    Making this about torture is more about trying to turn this into a "WE WON" moment for one political side.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,126
    Quote Originally Posted by KhrushchevsShoe View Post
    Waterboarding is not what led us to OBL. It was hard work and dedication in the intelligence community that remained constant over a grueling 9 years that pulled this off. You cant just dunk somebodies' head and magically find OBL, it takes using whatever information you get out of them and making the most of it by following every single lead that nets you a key piece of information that makes this happen.

    Making this about torture is more about trying to turn this into a "WE WON" moment for one political side.
    So you say it didnt lead us to him in one breath but then you said in another the info we got started on the path to him

    No shit it wasn't an end all be all but it HELPED YOU ASSHOLE and your side said it wasnt helpful at all to do it. So make your mind up
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    812
    Quote Originally Posted by Bailey View Post
    So you say it didnt lead us to him in one breath but then you said in another the info we got started on the path to him

    No shit it wasn't an end all be all but it HELPED YOU ASSHOLE and your side said it wasnt helpful at all to do it. So make your mind up
    I believe I said waterboarding was not soley responsible for finding him, which seems to be the narrative floating around now.

    Your side, my side... I dont care. You're the one who's more concerned with winning that game.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,126
    Quote Originally Posted by KhrushchevsShoe View Post
    I believe I said waterboarding was not soley responsible for finding him, which seems to be the narrative floating around now.

    Your side, my side... I dont care. You're the one who's more concerned with winning that game.
    Nope wrong again I am sick and tired of assholes like obama who take credit for things that they bashed at every turn (CIA,waterboarding, military etc) then when it helps him he is ok with it. :mad:


    If not for that piece of info recived via waterboarding would they have found him?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9 CONFIRMED: CIA Chief Panetta Admits Info From Waterboarding Led US to Osama Bin Laden 
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    Finally the truth…
    Obama CIA Chief Leon Panetta told NBC News today that Intelligence garnered from waterboarded detainees was used to track down al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden and kill him.

    VIDEO AT LINK

    Obama CIA chief admitted today that intelligence gleaned from enhanced interrogating techniques led the US to Osama Bin Laden.
    Today reported:

    Intelligence garnered from waterboarded detainees was used to track down al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden and kill him, CIA Chief Leon Panetta told NBC News on Tuesday.

    “Enhanced interrogation techniques” were used to extract information that led to the mission’s success, Panetta said during an interview with anchor Brian Williams. Those techniques included waterboarding, he acknowledged.

    Panetta, who in a 2009 CIA confirmation hearing declared “waterboarding is torture and it’s wrong,” said Tuesday that debate about its use will continue.

    “Whether we would have gotten the same information through other approaches I think is always gonna be an open question,” Panetta said.
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Zoomie djones520's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    10,072
    Dude... twice in two days. Stand by while I merge.
    In most sports, cold-cocking an opposing player repeatedly in the face with a series of gigantic Slovakian uppercuts would get you a multi-game suspension without pay.

    In hockey, it means you have to sit in the penalty box for five minutes.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •