Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19
  1. #1 Philly Police Harass, Threaten to Shoot Man Legally Carrying Gun 
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,889
    A story in today's Philadelphia Daily News shows why it's so important that citizens be allowed to videotape cops - it can be citizens' only way to fight back against police abuse of power.

    This incident happened several weeks ago in Philadelphia to Mark Fiorino, a 25-year-old IT worker who carries a gun on his hip at all times for self defense. He got the gun after several friends were mugged.......But he didn't count on attacks by police:

    On a mild February afternoon, Fiorino, 25, decided to walk to an AutoZone on Frankford Avenue in Northeast Philly with the .40-caliber Glock he legally owns holstered in plain view on his left hip. His stroll ended when someone called out from behind: "Yo, Junior, what are you doing?".....Fiorino wheeled and saw Sgt. Michael Dougherty aiming a handgun at him.

    What happened next would be hard to believe, except that Fiorino audio-recorded all of it: a tense, profanity-laced, 40-minute encounter with cops who told him that what he was doing - openly carrying a gun on the city's streets - was against the law.

    "Do you know you can't openly carry here in Philadelphia?" Dougherty asked, according to the YouTube clip......."Yes, you can, if you have a license to carry firearms," Fiorino said. "It's Directive 137. It's your own internal directive.".....Fiorino was right. It was perfectly legal to carry the gun. But that didn't matter to the cop:

    Fiorino offered to show Dougherty his driver's and firearms licenses. The cop told him to get on his knees......"Excuse me?" Fiorino said......"Get down on your knees. Just obey what I'm saying," Dougherty said.

    http://www.foxbusiness.com/on-air/st...y-carrying-gun
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,421
    It's Philly, I'm not surprised.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Fabulous Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    10,189
    This is not an isolated incident of ignorance of the law, especially disturbing when you consider that it's a civil rights issue.

    http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2007/se...eives-apology/

    As they walked out, Greene, who’d gone to the store to investigate a shoplifting call, told Putnam to stop. Greene asked for Putnam’s identification, grabbed his arm when he reached for his wallet and then asked why he carried a gun in public, records show.

    Putnam ended up against a concrete wall being frisked as Greene took his gun.

    “It’s called a concealed carry permit. State law says you carry it concealed, not in plain view (with the) hammer back,” Greene said. “I’ve been doing this for 12 years. I can put you in jail for something. It’s called inducing a panic.”

    Greene ultimately let Putnam go after talking with another officer but told him to pull his shirt over the gun. He told Internal Affairs investigators he thought Tennessee and Ohio, where he previously served as a police officer, prohibited open carrying. Neither state does.

    “There’s an issue there where there could be panic,” he said in a recorded statement. “I’m thinking the law is a concealed law. I’m not going to deal with a guy that has a loaded gun until I secure a weapon.”



    The issue here is not simply the ignorance of the law by these few or many police officers, which sometimes takes the form of disregard for the law behind some belief in a absolute right of police to "protect myself" at the expense of law and liberty. Our founding fathers did not merely intend to protect our liberty at the end of a day in court, they intended to define our liberty and enshrine our dignity. Police officers as such did not exist when our founding fathers were crafting this nation, and I suspect that they might have written some pretty hard and fast rules for them if they had. In effect, our founding fathers would have regarded the status of police officers in our society as too similar to the standing army they forbid. The idea that anyone under color of government would force a gentleman into a concrete wall or on the ground in submission to a public servant would have been cause in the time of the founding fathers to use his second amendment right to defend his liberty and his dignity.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,322
    the police don't like people competing with them.
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,322
    Love all the posturing by the police. Usually I support the police - but hearing this - several officers need to be removed from the force.
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Fabulous Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    10,189
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIpOXjVGneU


    "We're not here to harass you."

    Actually, that's exactly what they were doing.

    Merriam Webster

    1 a : exhaust, fatigue
    b (1) : to annoy persistently (2) : to create an unpleasant or hostile situation for especially by uninvited and unwelcome verbal or physical conduct
    2
    : to worry and impede by repeated raids <harassed the enemy>

    Note that this police officer is unable or unwilling to cite the law or his authority to do what he is doing. He puts the burden on the citizen to verify at some future date that he hasn't been illegally detained and harassed. This is completely unlike a traffic stop in which the police officer clearly states the the statute which has been broken and writes it on the ticket.
    Last edited by Novaheart; 05-17-2011 at 11:01 AM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,200
    They have a big set of balls to charge him with a crime, I'd sue the living shit out of them ASAP. I bet he has lawyers queing up to take the case :D
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,200
    Does anyone know if there is a place to donate for this mans defense fund?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Fabulous Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    10,189
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbHK_...eature=related

    This "FreeNH" and the "Free Keene" bunch are probably not people whose company I would enjoy too often, but I get a kick out of them and their objective.

    I think it has to be noted and addressed that these people are the embodiment of the founding father's comment that our constitution only works for a moral people. The level of liberty these people are demanding, ie the constitutional standard, works in Vermont and New Hampshire, but would it work in Los ANgeles or New York? Not simply because of the criminal element in those places, but in terms of population density do special accommodations have to be made?

    Note that the police are respecting these people's rights in this video.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,421
    Shame, a lawyer friend of mine who probably would have had this case died suddenly about a month or so ago. It would have been an interesting case. Although my guess is they drop everything pretty quietly.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •