Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22
  1. #1 Fox News Poll: Voters Say Stop U.S. Aid to Pakistan 
    Senior Member namvet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Western Mo
    Posts
    3,031
    Nearly three out of four voters -- 73 percent -- say the United States should stop sending foreign aid until Pakistan demonstrates a deeper commitment to the war against terrorism. Some 19 percent would continue to provide funding.

    Agreement is widespread, as majorities of Republicans (84 percent), Democrats (67 percent) and independents (66 percent), as well as both men (73 percent) and women (73 percent) say the U.S. should cut off funding to Pakistan.

    FOX

    screw em. wack em off they had their chance
    Liberals: Obama's useful Idiots
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    Quote Originally Posted by namvet View Post
    Nearly three out of four voters -- 73 percent -- say the United States should stop sending foreign aid until Pakistan demonstrates a deeper commitment to the war against terrorism. Some 19 percent would continue to provide funding.

    Agreement is widespread, as majorities of Republicans (84 percent), Democrats (67 percent) and independents (66 percent), as well as both men (73 percent) and women (73 percent) say the U.S. should cut off funding to Pakistan.

    FOX

    screw em. wack em off they had their chance
    We have practiced 'Dollar Diplomacy' for years too keep these crazy people from falling into the Islamic quagmire.
    Those in power in these Islamic countries have held back the hoards by payoffs and handouts using our bribe money .
    If we stop now the Islamists will surge into power and sell the warheads to the Islamic radicals to blow up the Israelis .That will lead to an mideast war to end all wars.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member namvet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Western Mo
    Posts
    3,031
    Quote Originally Posted by megimoo View Post
    We have practiced 'Dollar Diplomacy' for years too keep these crazy people from falling into the Islamic quagmire.
    Those in power in these Islamic countries have held back the hoards by payoffs and handouts using our bribe money .
    If we stop now the Islamists will surge into power and sell the warheads to the Islamic radicals to blow up the Israelis .That will lead to an mideast war to end all wars.
    they've already kicked or reduced our military there. i think they want us all out. and they've been helping terrorist now for at least 5 or 6 years. do we force ourselves to stay in??? blow up the nukes???

    exactly how much force do we use???
    Liberals: Obama's useful Idiots
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    CU's Tallest Midget! PoliCon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh PA
    Posts
    25,328
    Which only goes to show exactly how ignorant people are about the situation. We cannot - MUST NOT end foreign aid to Pakistan. :( Not so long as they have nukes.
    Stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    Quote Originally Posted by namvet View Post
    they've already kicked or reduced our military there. i think they want us all out. and they've been helping terrorist now for at least 5 or 6 years. do we force ourselves to stay in??? blow up the nukes???

    exactly how much force do we use???
    They have the Nukes scattered around the country in heavily garrisoned bases.Chances of our grabbing them short of an all out invasion are slim at best .We could nuke them but you know where that would lead.
    Bin ladin was an Afghan Mujahideen hero during the Soviet invasion and Afghans working for the ISI remember him from that war.It seems natural that they would help an Afghan hero like him .

    The Muslims on the street are a raging mob especially after friday noontime prayers when some Immam 'cranks them up' into a great Muslim howling mass .
    The Pakistani leaders know that they would be overthrown if they failed to pay the Islamic clerics their Baksheesh so the American Baksheesh is critical to a stable Pakistan .
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Zoomie djones520's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    10,080
    Quote Originally Posted by megimoo View Post
    They have the Nukes scattered around the country in heavily garrisoned bases.Chances of our grabbing them short of an all out invasion are slim at best .We could nuke them but you know where that would lead.
    Bin ladin was an Afghan Mujahideen hero during the Soviet invasion and Afghans working for the ISI remember him from that war.It seems natural that they would help an Afghan hero like him .

    The Muslims on the street are a raging mob especially after friday noontime prayers when some Immam 'cranks them up' into a great Muslim howling mass .
    The Pakistani leaders know that they would be overthrown if they failed to pay the Islamic clerics their Baksheesh so the American Baksheesh is critical to a stable Pakistan .
    Bingo.

    Shitty situation, but basically it's the price we're paying to keep those nukes outta the hands of Al Qaida.
    In most sports, cold-cocking an opposing player repeatedly in the face with a series of gigantic Slovakian uppercuts would get you a multi-game suspension without pay.

    In hockey, it means you have to sit in the penalty box for five minutes.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member namvet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Western Mo
    Posts
    3,031
    im told the nukes can't be launched. so how certain are we the terrorists don't already have what they need??? more than enough time to get it. there are some things we must assume.
    Liberals: Obama's useful Idiots
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Zoomie djones520's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    10,080
    Quote Originally Posted by namvet View Post
    im told the nukes can't be launched. so how certain are we the terrorists don't already have what they need??? more than enough time to get it. there are some things we must assume.
    How do we know they don't have them already?

    Bagram AB is still there.
    In most sports, cold-cocking an opposing player repeatedly in the face with a series of gigantic Slovakian uppercuts would get you a multi-game suspension without pay.

    In hockey, it means you have to sit in the penalty box for five minutes.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member namvet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Western Mo
    Posts
    3,031
    Quote Originally Posted by djones520 View Post
    How do we know they don't have them already?

    Bagram AB is still there.
    that's first high priority target??? what's BL been doing there all these years. watching goats fuck on TV ???
    Liberals: Obama's useful Idiots
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Zoomie djones520's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    10,080
    Quote Originally Posted by namvet View Post
    that's first high priority target??? what's BL been doing there all these years. watching goats fuck on TV ???
    In Afghanistan, Bagram would be the highest priority target to completely screw us over there. They wouldn't even need a direct hit. They'd just have to detonate slightly upwind to shut the place down.
    In most sports, cold-cocking an opposing player repeatedly in the face with a series of gigantic Slovakian uppercuts would get you a multi-game suspension without pay.

    In hockey, it means you have to sit in the penalty box for five minutes.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •