Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1 +++++ Sarah Palin Rumors Du Group Suggestion +++++ 
    Sonnabend
    Guest
    http://www.democraticunderground.com...955569#6955588

    The words slander and libel come to mind.

    hecorrection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Sep-05-08 07:41 PM
    Original message
    +++++ SARAH PALIN RUMORS DU GROUP SUGGESTION +++++

    Edited on Fri Sep-05-08 07:41 PM by thecorrection
    Do I hear a "Hell yeah from 10 DU donors?"

    If so, we need a proposed mission statement. The Sarah Palin Rumors Group would exist for the duration of this election and would free up the GD :Presidential for more "pressing" discussion about the election.
    Muckrakers Anonymous or Slander Inc would do...

    dist22dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Sep-05-08 09:33 PM
    Response to Original message
    37. Well, as a starting point -- The mission of the Sarah Palin Rumor Group is to identify and discuss the validity of circulated rumors, news and information about her life, career, and political future.
    Wonder what a lawyer would say.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member LibraryLady's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    3,748
    Maybe this would help them:

    Palin Rumors
    Cripes, this has gotten ridiculous. Folks, look, let’s just run through a list here. (Updated.)

    * No, the Downs baby (Trig) isn’t Bristol’s kid, and no, the kid wasn’t born with Downs because (a) Palin flew on an airplane (b) went home to have the baby after an amniotic leak (c) because he was the result of incest between Todd Palin and Bristol.
    * No, Track (the kid who is leaving for Iraq) didn’t join the NG because he was a drug addict. He may have joined the NG because he was tired of people saying his Mom was getting him into the good hockey leagues.
    * No, she’s never been in any porn as far as anyone can find (and God knows I get enough google hits on those very topics.)
    * No, no one seems to be able to even find swimsuit pictures of her from her beauty queen days; God knows I looked. The bikini pictures that are around are photoshopped, just like the Vogue cover I have up.
    * No she wasn’t a member of the (wild-eyed libertarian) Alaska independence Party, although her husband once was
    * No, neither the (Canadian) National Post, nor Marc Armbinder at the Atlantic have troubled themselves to issue a correction. Yes, the New York Times did finally correct their story of September 1 — on September 5. This was after Elizabeth Bumiller was quoted by Howard Kurtz as saying she was “completely confident about the story.” Yes, that was after the New York Times’s source retracted the story.

    Yes, this should embarrass the Times, Bumiller, and Howard Kurtz. No, there have been no signs of embarrassment.
    * No, she was never a Pat Buchanan supporter; even when Buchanan claims she was, she was on the board of Steve Forbes’a campaign.
    * No, she’s not anti-semitic. In fact, she has an Israeli flag in her office. (Contrary to popular belief, the usual Evangelical thinks Israel has a right to exist, granted by God.)
    * No, she’s doesn’t believe that the Iraq War was directed by God. Yes, she did pray that proceeding with the war was God’s will. (Ever hear the phrase “Not my will, but Thine, be done”?)
    * No, Buchanan doesn’t support her now; in fact he’s supporting Obama. (Buchanan did think her speech was amazing, but then so do 80 percent of the people who saw it.)
    * yes, she was pregnant when she got married
    * No, so far there’s no confirmation she had an affair while she was married, and they’ve denied it pretty strongly. No, she wouldn’t be the first Christian woman who got a little on the side, if it were true.
    * No, she wasn’t named as a co-respondent in a divorce; there’s no evidence she had an affair with her husbands’ business partner. The partner tried to have his divorce records sealed because he was being harrassed by journalists who used them to get his phone number.
    * Yes, Bristol appears to have had sex with her fiancee. No, Bristol didn’t receive only “abstinence-only” sex ed.
    * Yes, I have it on reliable report that Sarah Levi’s mom has been heard screaming “Way to go Levi!” at her future son-in-law son. No, it doesn’t appear to have been when Bristol broke the news to her family.
    Note: I originally understood this story to be about Sarah, not Levi’s mom, in the context of hockey games. As such, it’s shouldn’t be in a Sarah Palin Rumors story, but I like the story too much to delete it.
    * yes, her 17 year old daughter is pregnant; no, the baby’s father is not an eighth grader; no, having sex at 16 is not statutory rape in Alaska
    * yes, she did fire the public safety guy — but he said in the Anchorage paper that, for the record, she never, and no one else in her administration ever, tried to make him fire her ex-brother-in-law
    * and yes, the state trooper (her sister’s ex-husband) she was worried about did: tase her 10 year old nephew; drive his state patrol car while drinking or drunk; did threaten to “bring her down”; and did threaten to murder her father and sister if they dared to get an attorney to help with the divorce.
    * yes, the state trooper was suspended when he was put under a court protective order
    * no, the trooper wasn’t fired
    * yes, she did fire the Wasilla Chief of Police as Mayor; yes, it was because he was lying to the City Council.
    * No, she didn’t cut funding for unwed mothers; yes, she did increase it by “only” 354 percent instead of 454 percent, as part of a multi-year capital expenditures program. No, the Washington Post doesn’t appear to have corrected their story. Even after this was pointed out in the comments on the story.
    * No, she didn’t cut special needs student funding; yes, she did raise it by “only” 175 percent.
    * yes, she did try, clearly unsuccessfully, to get Bristol married off to her fiancee before the story came out
    * yes, she did ask the librarian if some books could be withdrawn because of being offensive; no, they couldn’t; yes she did threaten to fire the librarian a month later; no, that wasn’t over the books thing but instead over administrative issues; no, the librarian wasn’t fired either; yes, the librarian was a big supporter of one of her political opponents; yes, the librarian was also the girlfriend of the Chief of police mentioned above; no, this is not the first time in the history of civilization that someone has been threatened with being fired over a political dispute
    * No the list of books she wanted to ban that’s being passed around isn’t real; among other things, it includes a number of books published after her time in office there.
    * No, that hasn’t actually deterred people from claiming it really is true even if the list isn’t correct. For example:

    “This list might not in fact reflect the books Sarah Palin wanted banned. As more than one person in Comments has pointed out, some of them were not published when Palin was in office. It is my hope that the mainstream media will not let this story drop and that at some point an actual list will surface. The very thought of having someone who once advocated book-banning possibly occupying one of the highest offices of our land fills me with profound dread. It should fill you with dread too.”

    No, I don’t understand why a fake list is supposed to fill me with dread, either.
    * no, it wasn’t a shotgun wedding; Bristol and Levi been engaged for a good while according to his mother. It was either an accident or just an unconventional order.
    * yes, she’s an Assembly of God Holy Roller.
    * yes, she apparently believes in some variant of Intelligent Design
    * no, she didn’t try to force the schools to teach it; she said if someone brought it up, it was an appropriate subject for debate.
    * yes, she kills animals and eats them, and wears their skins
    * yes, she was a beauty contest contestant
    * yes, she was once a sportscaster
    * yes, she has a college degree in Journalism, but I won’t hold that against her, as she seems to have found honest work as well
    * yes, she sometimes wears her hair up; no that’s not a “beehive”
    * yes, her husband is Not A White Person (he’s a Yup’ik; an Eskimo but not an Inuit as my Inuit cousins have taken some pains to explain)
    * yes, she has on occasion tried to get money from the federal government.
    * yes, she did finally turn down the money for the bridge. Yes, that meant changing her mind about it.
    * yes, she was vetted extensively, not just in three days — I’ve got links to press reports about people coming to Wassila on 29 May, and we had her on our Veepstakes at PJM from the first day we ran it.
    * yes, she want to a bunch of colleges before getting a degree. No, that’s not illegal. Yes, she seems to have made something of herself anyway.
    * no, they didn’t talk to a lot of the R’s power structure during the vetting; that probably has to do with the fact that she beat them in elections and sent a bunch of them to jail.
    * Yes, Sarah Palin’s acceptance speech was written by a speechwriter. Duh. No, none of Obama’s, McCain’s, nor Biden’s speeches were impromptu off the cuff things either.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member FDK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,616
    Why is it taht NOW DUmmies re having problems with bullshit rumors being posted in GD?

    When even the DUmmies know that DUmmies are:

    Neecy (1000+ posts) Fri Sep-05-08 07:44 PM
    Response to Original message
    6. I'll second that
    Some of this stuff is making us look batshit crazy...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Brandon, FL
    Posts
    315
    They are BATSHIT CRAZY


    The best part is that they do all the work :)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Sonora, Texas
    Posts
    4,117
    Go ahead, DUmmies. Your strategy of tearing this woman down has worked so well so far.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member FDK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,616
    I've got a great suggestion for the name of this new group: Democratic Underground :D
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    221
    Oh man, that site is full of PMS - Palin McCain Syndrome :p

    They love to hate, don't they?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member LibraryLady's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    3,748
    I got a kick out of their list of Library books she supposedly wanted to ban. It is straight off the site "Most Challenged Books" and some of them were published AFTER she was no longer mayor. NONSENSE!!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member LibraryLady's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    3,748
    The tone is changing over there. They never post it but many of their wild rumors have been debunked so they just jump on something new. Now it's "speaking in tongues" and they insist it's a symptom of clinical psychosis!

    DU is a symptom of clinical psychosis!
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •