Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20
  1. #11  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    16,155
    Quote Originally Posted by Kay View Post
    Me too.
    No mother would allow 30 days to go by with a kid missing
    before calling in the cops. That's what proves her guilt to me.
    Several things prove guilt:

    1-The google searches on chloroform(um, yeah, moms, a nurse, was looking at chlorophyll and accidentally stumbled upon a web site that described chloroform...84 times).

    2-The google searches on neck breaking.

    3-The scent of decomp in the trunk of Casey's car picked up on everyone including a cadaver dog.

    4-The banding on a piece of Caylee's hair found in the trunk of Casey's car which medical examiners said can only happen in a dead body. There is a 100% certainty of that.

    5-The notion that Caylee accidentally drowned in the Anthony's pool and George's subsequent cover up because Casey's mother would be pissed at her is bullshit because Casey is seen dancing and partying at a nightclub just days after Caylee allegedly drowned. Does this look like someone who's baby daughter died days ago:


    If I'm a juror, this picture and the dozens like it are the money shots to me.
    The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Grouchy Old Broad Kay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Midland, Tx
    Posts
    3,699
    Yes I agree, there is a lot of evidence that I'd have no qualms over finding her guilty for if I were on the jury. But still, the cincher for me, just from a motherly point of view, is having your child missing and not going into complete panic mode calling in the cops and everyone else who will listen immediately. No mother could let 30 days go by like that unless they knew all along where the kid really was.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Senior Ape Articulate_Ape's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    NJ, Exit Only
    Posts
    7,967
    Quote Originally Posted by NJCardFan View Post
    So you're glad a 3 year old little girl is dead? Please clarify.
    How many 3 year old little girls died today outside the venue of Nancy Grace and Greta van Sustern, NJ? Maybe saying I was glad she's dead was over the top, but, in case you haven't noticed, that's who I am. I'm sick of hearing about the pet crime of the day. I am sorry the kid is dead, but I honestly don't care. Maybe that makes me a horrible person in your mind. I can live with that.

    Would you worry about a dead child on your sinking ship? The news should be covering the economic comet coming our way, not the cute girl death du jour.

    Shoot me for being realistic.
    "The efforts of the government alone will never be enough. In the end the people must choose and the people must help themselves" ~ JFK; from his famous inauguration speech (What Democrats sounded like before today's neo-Liberals hijacked that party)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    Power CUer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    11,428
    I haven't been following it at all. If I could tune out the entire OJ trial, I can certainly ignore this.
    "Today, [the American voter] chooses his rulers as he buys bootleg whiskey, never knowing precisely what he is getting, only certain that it is not what it pretends to be." - H.L. Mencken
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,421
    I haven't watched much of it. I don't get why this particular case is so national newsworthy to the extent that it has been. What little I followed of the early part of the trial made me think there are some serious appellate issues there. Unfortunate, because I don't think there's any doubt that she's guilty.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #16  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    16,155
    Quote Originally Posted by Phillygirl View Post
    I haven't watched much of it. I don't get why this particular case is so national newsworthy to the extent that it has been. What little I followed of the early part of the trial made me think there are some serious appellate issues there. Unfortunate, because I don't think there's any doubt that she's guilty.
    I think Baez's incompetence will be a major appellate angle. He's all over the place.
    The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #17  
    Quote Originally Posted by Phillygirl View Post
    I haven't watched much of it. I don't get why this particular case is so national newsworthy to the extent that it has been. What little I followed of the early part of the trial made me think there are some serious appellate issues there. Unfortunate, because I don't think there's any doubt that she's guilty.
    I have followed this (more or less) from the beginning. I think there are a few elements that make this story more compelling than the usual bored-parent-kills-kid saga.

    No one (including the grandmother) seemed to think it was odd that they hadn't seen the kid for a month. Parents normally never shut up about their procreative powers. Mom was either really clever in terms of manipulating conversation (unlikely) or the kid was already such a marginal part of family life that people just forgot about her.

    Mom partied down when she should have been doing the usual distraught-parent thing.

    Two words: Death Stench.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #18  
    Senior Member obx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    KIll Devil Hills, N.C.
    Posts
    1,232
    Death row will provide her with a few more years to live. If she is in general population in prison or let go all together she will not live six months. Too many people hate her for killing that child.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #19  
    Power CUer noonwitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Warren, MI
    Posts
    12,695
    I think she's guilty and I think the jury is going to find her guilty and sentence her to the death penalty.

    That said, I also think that her lawyers believe she is guilty and that is why they are treating her trial like it is already the sentencing hearing. Casey's claim of sexual abuse has no place in the trial phase, it's a mitigating circumstance for sentencing (not that I believe it). I wonder if they are trying to be incompetent in order to give her an appellate strategy.

    I'm also disgusted that the Italians are reviewing Amanda Knox's case. That little sociopath is probably going to walk.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #20  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    16,155
    The judge smacked down a little snot nosed idiot who thought it would be cool to flip the bird during questioning Ashton was doing today. He was seen and brought before the judge and the judge after bitch slapping him verbally, imposed a 6 day lock up in county as well as a total fines and costs in excess of $650.
    The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •